Easier Method to Calculate Earth's Circumference

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on two methods for calculating the circumference of the Earth, specifically Eratosthenes' method and an alternative method presented by a professor. Eratosthenes' approach involves measuring the angle of the shadow cast by a stick when the sun is directly overhead at a specific location, allowing for geometric calculations to determine the Earth's circumference. The alternative method suggested by the professor involves measuring the angles of shadows cast by two sticks at different locations, potentially simplifying the process by eliminating the need for direct overhead sunlight. However, there are uncertainties regarding the orientation of the sticks and the accuracy of the alternative method, particularly in relation to the cardinal directions and the timing of shadow measurements. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding both methods and their implications for accurately calculating the Earth's circumference.
marcusau
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
My professor was showing us how to calculate the Circumference of the Earth using Eratosthenes method, as shown here. I completely understand this method. http://www.bsin.k12.nm.us/Curriculum/CAP/completed%20files/astronomy/completed%20files/eratosthenescircumf.html

However he told us he had an easier method and to use it. I'm not sure if it works, however. I have attached the slide from his lecture that explains what he was saying to do. I understand Eratosthene's method because the sun's rays are directly over the southern most stick and the shadow cast by the northern stick then can be used to find the angle that subtends the arc, which is the distance between the two sticks.

I suppose using his method you have to measure the angle cast by both sticks using a protractor, rather than having the option to use geometry like in the original.

Also, I am not sure about the direction of the shadow cast by the sun based on the way he has the sticks are oriented, given the cardinal directions given in the diagram.

Thanks for any help or input.
 

Attachments

  • eratosthene.jpg
    eratosthene.jpg
    31.3 KB · Views: 871
Last edited by a moderator:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
The diagram looks like the same method, just that the Sun need not be directly overhead as in your description and the one in your link. It is the difference between the two shadows that counts - if you wait for one of the shadows to have no length, then the math is probably easier.
 
Thread 'The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones'
(Edit: since the thread title was changed, this first sentence is too cryptic: the original title referred to a Tool song....) Besides being a favorite song by a favorite band, the thread title is a straightforward play on words. This summer, as a present to myself for being promoted, I purchased a collection of thin sections that I believe comprise the research materials of Prof. Rob Verschure, who at the time was faculty in the Geological Institute in Amsterdam. What changed this...
These last days, there is a seemingly endless cluster of rather powerful earthquakes close to the islands of Santorini, Amorgos, Anafi, and Ios. Remember, this is a highly volcanically active region, Santorini especially being famous for the supervolcanic eruption which is conjectured to have led to the decline of the Minoan civilization: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minoan_eruption To grasp the scale of what is happening, between the 26th of January and the 9th of February, 12000...
Back
Top