Does a Charge on a Closed Surface Contribute to Electric Flux?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lugita15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gauss's law Law
AI Thread Summary
Gauss's Law states that the electric flux through a closed surface equals the enclosed charge divided by epsilon_0, excluding external charges. The discussion raises the question of whether a charge located exactly on the surface counts as enclosed. It is clarified that, by definition, only charges fully enclosed by the surface are considered, meaning surface charges do not contribute to the flux. Additionally, if a charge is on the surface, the electric field at that point becomes undefined, complicating the application of Gauss's theorem. Therefore, charges on the surface do not create nonzero flux through the closed surface.
lugita15
Messages
1,553
Reaction score
15
According to Gauss's Law, the electric flux through a closed surface is equal to the charge enclosed by the surface divided by epsilon_0. This obviously excludes charges outside the surface. But what about *on* the surface? That is, it lies neither inside nor outside. Does this charge count as being "enclosed" in the sense of Gauss's Law? In other words, does the electric field of a charge "on" a closed surface create a nonzero flux through the surface?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank You in Advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lugita15 said:
According to Gauss's Law, the electric flux through a closed surface is equal to the charge enclosed by the surface divided by epsilon_0. This obviously excludes charges outside the surface. But what about *on* the surface? That is, it lies neither inside nor outside. Does this charge count as being "enclosed" in the sense of Gauss's Law? In other words, does the electric field of a charge "on" a closed surface create a nonzero flux through the surface?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank You in Advance.

I believe by definition all charge must be enclosed, therefore there is no surface charge.
 
A Gaussian surface is a mathematical surface you decide on.
To apply Gauss's theorem, you must choose a surface that has charge either within or without, but not on your Gaussian surfce.
 
If a charge was on the surface, the flux would be undefined at that point (since the field itself is undefined at the charge itself)
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top