Question about high speed objects

  • Thread starter Thread starter false vacume
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    High speed Speed
AI Thread Summary
High-velocity impacts, such as those from asteroids or comets, result in a complex interplay of kinetic and thermal energy. Upon impact, the asteroid's kinetic energy is converted into thermal energy and the kinetic energy of the debris created by the collision. This transformation leads to the vaporization and melting of surrounding materials, producing effects akin to an explosion. The rapid release of energy and generation of high temperatures during such impacts align with the definition of an explosion. Therefore, both kinetic and explosive characteristics are present in these high-speed collisions.
false vacume
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If an object is moving at a high velocity (i.e. an asteroid or comet) and it impacts something such as a planet is the resulting force of the impact explosive or kinetic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's complicated. The asteroid initially has a very large amount of kinetic energy. When it hits an object that energy must be transferred or converted to something else in order for the asteroid to stop. When the asteroid impacts something, the kinetic energy is converted to thermal and kinetic energy of the resulting collision products. That's why the impact vaporizes and melts a significant amount of material and why it shoots it out and up into the air. The overall effect is similar to a large explosion. In fact, it pretty much is the definition of an explosion. Per wiki:

An explosion is a rapid increase in volume and release of energy in an extreme manner, usually with the generation of high temperatures and the release of gases. Supersonic explosions created by high explosives are known as detonations and travel via supersonic shock waves. Subsonic explosions are created by low explosives through a slower burning process known as deflagration.

The impact would generate quite an explosion.
 
Me and a friend were arguing about which on it is. Guess we are both right.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top