Question about integration shouldn't be too difficult

  • Thread starter Thread starter AxiomOfChoice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on performing integration with respect to time, specifically the integral of a function f dependent on another function φ(t). It explores the possibility of rewriting the integral in terms of φ and its derivative, leading to the question of whether it's valid to cancel dt and integrate with respect to φ. The need to change the limits of integration when switching variables is acknowledged, emphasizing the importance of proper substitution. An example is provided involving the mass of a rod, illustrating the transition from time-space to distance-space integration. The overall conclusion reinforces the validity of integration by substitution when done correctly.
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
Really, I should know the answer to this, but...

Suppose I'm trying to perform an integration with respect to t:

<br /> \int_0^T f(\phi(t)) dt<br />

So my function f is explicitly a function of \phi, and \phi depends on time t. But then suppose I end up being able to write the integral as

<br /> \int_0^T g(\phi(t)) \frac{d \phi}{dt} dt.<br /> [/itex]<br /> <br /> Can I just cancel the dt and perform an integral with respect to \phi? If so, I need to change the limits of integration, right?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, this is my understanding.

Example: Find the mass of a rod of length L and uniform mass density D.

M = integral of dm

D = dm/dx

so D dx/dm = 1 and

M = integral of (1 dm) = integral of (D dx/dm dm) = integral of(D dx)

Since you're now working in distance-space, you just switch the limit to the distance-space limit, namely, 0 -> L.
 
Also known as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integration_by_substitution" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top