Question about intermediate frequency

  • Thread starter Thread starter chingkui
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of intermediate frequency (IF) in demodulation processes, particularly in the context of radio receivers. Participants explore the theoretical and practical reasons for employing IF, including its implications for signal processing and image frequency management.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that using a fixed IF allows for easier maintenance of constant bandpass characteristics, including width, shape, and gain.
  • Others argue that multiple IFs can help avoid image frequencies and other unwanted signals in the receiver.
  • A participant questions the effectiveness of multiple IFs for image frequency rejection, noting that a mixer circuit can produce multiple output signals that may complicate filtering.
  • One participant provides a detailed example of an AM broadcast receiver, explaining the mixing process and the potential for image frequencies, while emphasizing the importance of tracking filters.
  • Another participant points out a potential typo in the example regarding the desired signal frequency, suggesting it should refer to 570 kHz instead of 1000 kHz.
  • There is a discussion about the concept of direct conversion receivers and the implications of local oscillator frequency positioning (high side vs. low side injection).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of multiple IFs for image frequency rejection, and there is no consensus on the clarity of the mixing process described. Some agree on the general principles of IF use, while others challenge specific claims and interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of signal interactions in receivers, including the presence of harmonics and the potential for various unwanted signals. The discussion highlights the nuanced nature of filtering and signal processing in practical applications.

chingkui
Messages
178
Reaction score
2
I have been reading about demodulation. It seems like in practice, a high frequency signal is mixed to bring it down to lower IF, sometimes in multiply steps, for demodulation. When I was taking a digital communication class, all I learn was to bring that signal down to baseband and then detect it. Can anyone point out why IF is used in practice? where can I find the theoretical reason for doing this? Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Generally, its easier to maintain a constant bandpass characteristics with a fixed IF(width, shape, gain).
Stacking IFs is usually done if an extremely narrow bandwidh is wanted.
 
Multiple IFs are usually used to avoid image frequencies and other unwanted signals from coming through the receiver.
 
Don't know that it does much for image frequencies.
The mixer circuit allows three input signals to show up in the first IF passband. One + the difference, one - the difference and the third at the IF passband.
They will all pass equally well to the second IF and RF design is needed to eliminate the undesired channels.
 
No time, I'm not sure I understand your last post at all. And I'm not sure what you mean by 'stacking' IFs. Your description of what comes out of a mixer and how far the signals go into the IF chain is somewhat confusing also.
-
In a nutshell, here is what happens in the typical AM broadcast receiver: We'll use that because it is fairly well known and simple. All signals in the AM broadcast band arrive at the mixer, or convertor as it was called in the olden days. For this example I will assume that the station we want is at 570 Khz and is the ONLY one in the AM band. The local oscillator is tuned to a frequency that is 455 Khz above the wanted stations frequency. Depending on the type of mixer, a number of signals come out of it. More simple mixers will have 4 signals coming out in this example. They will be: 1) The local oscillator (LO) frequency, 2) The 1000 Khz signal that is wanted, 3) The sum of the LO and the station, 4) The difference of the LO and the station. We only want one of these and the job of the IF stages in the receiver is to selectively amplify these 4 signals. That means only the difference signal is amplified which is 455 Khz. The rest are suppressed. Now, the local oscillator in this example would be running at 1025 Khz. Now suppose that there is a signal on 1480 Khz also. The difference between the LO in this case and the 1480 Khz signal is 455 Khz. So the 1480 signal would also be converted and amplified in the IF. It's known as the image. Normally in AM receivers there is a tracking filter or preselector that tracks the LO and let's only the section of the band pass through that is desired. This supresses the image. Now you're right No Time, multiple IFs in and of themselves don't eliminate images. The key to that is a higher IF frequency. Take the FM band for example with a 10.7 Mhz IF. Notice that it is not possible for there to be an image from within the FM broadcast band. The math just doesn't work out. I don't think FM broadcast radios typically have more than one IF frequency anyway. But, a lot of commercial two-way radios and other higher performance receivers use several intermediate frequencies. I don't call them stacked, they are properly called single or dual conversion receivers. RF testing equipment will sometimes have 3 or more conversions. There is also something called a direct conversion receiver. Familiar with it?
-
I also might mention that the LO is not always higher than the wanted signal. Sometimes it is lower. This is known as low side injection. The other is logically called high side injection.
 
Hi Averagesupernova
Clarity isn't always my strong suit:cry:

I don't disagree with most of what you said.
I did have an issue with the image rejection part of your previous post.

While you correctly point out the operation of the mixer circuit, the point I was trying to make is that the mixer will also pass a signal at 455khz.
So the IF in your AM example, where LO=1025khz could potentially pass three different transmitted signals -> LO-570Khz=455khz, 1480khz-LO= 455khz and 455khz=455khz. In the last case the LO does not come into play and you essentially have direct conversion or what we used to call TRF.

Not sure where "2) The 1000 Khz signal that is wanted" came from.
I suspect it's a typo and you meant to put 570 Khz there.
 
NoTime said:
Hi Averagesupernova
Clarity isn't always my strong suit:cry:

I don't disagree with most of what you said.
I did have an issue with the image rejection part of your previous post.

While you correctly point out the operation of the mixer circuit, the point I was trying to make is that the mixer will also pass a signal at 455khz.
So the IF in your AM example, where LO=1025khz could potentially pass three different transmitted signals -> LO-570Khz=455khz, 1480khz-LO= 455khz and 455khz=455khz. In the last case the LO does not come into play and you essentially have direct conversion or what we used to call TRF.

Not sure where "2) The 1000 Khz signal that is wanted" came from.
I suspect it's a typo and you meant to put 570 Khz there.

Yes, it is a typo. :frown: The receiver would in fact pass 455 Khz and operate as TRF you are correct. However, it is outside of the range of frequencies we want so I didn't consider it. If you want to get technical, there are hundreds of signals in a simple receiver that can get in when we don't want them. Consider the 2nd and 3rd harmonic of the LO mixing with some other signal. Again, the advantage of having a higher IF puts all the signals that can get in that we don't want farther away from the band of interest. Naturally it is easier to filter those out when they are farther away.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K