Question about momentum and kinetic energy

AI Thread Summary
Kinetic energy is defined as half the mass multiplied by the square of velocity, while momentum is the product of mass and velocity. The discussion highlights that the conservation of kinetic energy relates to time symmetry, whereas momentum conservation is tied to spatial symmetry. Participants suggest exploring Noether's theorem for a deeper understanding of these concepts. There is a request for intuitive explanations regarding the relationship between velocity squared and symmetry. The conversation emphasizes the importance of these principles in physics.
larsa
Messages
47
Reaction score
2
First of all i am not a native speaker so i apologize for my english.
Kinetic energy is velocity squared multiplied by mass, whereas momentum is just velocity multiplied by mass.
I have read that the reason for this is because conservation of kinetic energy is related to symmetry of the motion in time and conservation of momentum is related to the symmetry in the motion of space.
Could someone give an intuitive or not explanation about this?

Thank you in advance
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
Do a search on Noether's theorem on PF. You will find many thread discussing the subject.
 
DrClaude said:
Do a search on Noether's theorem on PF. You will find many thread discussing the subject.
What i don't understand is how velocity squared is related to symmetry. I have not found any explanation about this. I will look again, thanks
 
larsa said:
First of all i am not a native speaker so i apologize for my english.
Kinetic energy is velocity squared multiplied by mass, whereas momentum is just velocity multiplied by mass.
I have read that the reason for this is because conservation of kinetic energy is related to symmetry of the motion in time and conservation of momentum is related to the symmetry in the motion of space.
Could someone give an intuitive or not explanation about this?

Thank you in advance

There is no need to apologise for your near perfect English!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top