Question about Natural Units in High Energy Physics

Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
20
I have a quick question about the units used in high energy physics. In natural units, c = h = 1, but I keep seeing time referenced as t=\frac{1}{m^2}. I figure there's 2 h-bars on top but that still leaves s^2. Can someone straighten me out here? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming you remember the speed of light, the only other combination you need to remember is \hbar c\approx 200 MeV fm
(It's really 197.326 9631(49) according to PDG[/URL])

With unit c=1 you get that space and time are really measured in the same unit, as well as energy and mass
(and momentum, when restoring c just remember [itex]E^2=p^2c^2+m^2c^4[/itex])
So finally [itex]\hbar[/itex]=1 gives you time and mass (or space and energy) with opposite dimensions :

t ~ [itex]\hbar c[/itex]/m[itex]c^2[/itex]
x~ct
E~pc
xp~[itex]\hbar[/itex]
Et~[itex]\hbar[/itex]For instance an interaction which would be mediated by a pion (with mass 135-139 MeV/c[sup]2[/sup]) will act (with a Yukawa potential) over distances of the order of :
200/140 ~ 1.5 fm (just about twice the usual definition of the size of the proton, quite good considering the handwaviness)

The typical interaction time is also 1.5x10[sup]-9[/sup]/3x10[sup]8[/sup] ~ 5x10[sup]-18[/sup] s
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pengwuino said:
I have a quick question about the units used in high energy physics. In natural units, c = h = 1, but I keep seeing time referenced as t=\frac{1}{m^2}. I figure there's 2 h-bars on top but that still leaves s^2. Can someone straighten me out here? Thanks!

To add to what Humanino wrote: in natural units t=1/m. If you have seen t =1/m^2 it was a typo.
 
nrqed said:
To add to what Humanino wrote: in natural units t=1/m. If you have seen t =1/m^2 it was a typo.

Sorry, I meant to change it but never got around to it. In the discussions I've been seeing it, the time was proportional to \frac{1}{m^2}. So there's some constants that I'm missing because the speaker was just showing us various proportionalitys
 
Pengwuino said:
Sorry, I meant to change it but never got around to it. In the discussions I've been seeing it, the time was proportional to \frac{1}{m^2}. So there's some constants that I'm missing because the speaker was just showing us various proportionalitys

Well, time is not proportional to \frac{1}{m^2} but to \frac{1}{m}.
 
Back
Top