Question about Neutrino oscillation

s3d18
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
i would like to ask a few questions about Neutrino oscillation

1) How can i calculate/obtain the mass eigenstates and weak eigenstates of neutrino
if we can get those, then how come we cannot obtain the mass eigenvalues.

2) why we know the relation between mass eigenstates and weak eigenstates (the relation involve PMNS matrix) in the beginning.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure I understand what your asking.

1) When you diagonalize a mass matrix (or any matrix for that matter) you have the eigenvalues ( mass eigenvalues) and the transformation matrix from the mass eigenstates basis to the weak eigenstate basis (which includes the mixing angles and pssible phases).

The mass eigenvalues are independent of the mixing angles. Therefore knowing the mixing angles (which have been measured) doesn't determine the masses.


2) we know the relation because we measure the mixing angles in oscillation experiments ( to a certain accuracy)
 
ofirg said:
I'm not sure I understand what your asking.

1) When you diagonalize a mass matrix (or any matrix for that matter) you have the eigenvalues ( mass eigenvalues) and the transformation matrix from the mass eigenstates basis to the weak eigenstate basis (which includes the mixing angles and pssible phases).

The mass eigenvalues are independent of the mixing angles. Therefore knowing the mixing angles (which have been measured) doesn't determine the masses.


2) we know the relation because we measure the mixing angles in oscillation experiments ( to a certain accuracy)

Thank you.
So, we cannot obtain the mass eigenvalues through the calculation?
 
So, we cannot obtain the mass eigenvalues through the calculation?


We can't calculate the masses from the parameters measured so far (mixing angles and mass squared differences). The absolute mass scale is an additional independent parameter.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
87
Views
18K
Replies
52
Views
5K
Back
Top