Question about Piezoelectricity

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter superpaul3000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Piezoelectricity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of piezoelectricity, specifically its ability to generate voltage in response to mechanical stress. Participants explore theoretical applications, practical limitations, and the feasibility of using piezoelectric materials for energy generation in various contexts, including macro and atomic scales.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the practicality of using piezoelectric materials to generate energy by placing them under a mountain, suggesting that the voltage produced may not be sustained once the mechanical stress is removed.
  • Another participant clarifies that piezoelectric materials can only produce a small displacement of charge, which limits their ability to provide constant DC current.
  • It is noted that piezoelectric devices can generate high-frequency AC current, but require variable mechanical stress to produce useful power.
  • A participant speculates about the possibility of using piezoelectric materials to convert atomic-scale kinetic energy into electricity, suggesting a design involving nano-sized piezoelectric plates.
  • Discussion includes the concept of using piezoelectricity in microphones, highlighting the difference in mechanical stress levels between sound waves and air molecules bouncing off piezoelectric devices.
  • Another participant proposes the idea of using a superconducting circuit to enhance the efficiency of energy capture from piezoelectric materials.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of understanding and skepticism regarding the practical applications of piezoelectricity, particularly in unconventional scenarios. There is no consensus on the feasibility of using piezoelectric materials for energy generation at the atomic scale or in cooling applications.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention limitations related to the amount of charge displacement and the nature of the mechanical stress required for effective energy generation. The discussion also touches on the challenges of achieving detectable currents from small-scale interactions.

superpaul3000
Messages
62
Reaction score
1
I was reading the wiki article on Piezoelectricity and this effect is either really odd or I'm missing something obvious here (I know wikipedia is not the best source but I'm feeling lazy). The article states that a Piezoelectric material will produce a voltage in response to mechanical stress. So looking at the picture there it looks like simply applying pressure to something will produce a voltage that I can run an electric load on. If that is true then we can just put one of these under a mountain and humanity's energy needs are taken care of forever!? Something about that just doesn't make sense. Do they mean that the increase in pressure produces a voltage but after that pressure is done increasing the voltage drops again? So dropping a mountain on one of these would make a lot of energy obviously lol.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
superpaul3000 said:
I was reading the wiki article on Piezoelectricity and this effect is either really odd or I'm missing something obvious here (I know wikipedia is not the best source but I'm feeling lazy). The article states that a Piezoelectric material will produce a voltage in response to mechanical stress. So looking at the picture there it looks like simply applying pressure to something will produce a voltage that I can run an electric load on.

It seems you missed the third sentence in the article you were reading.
If the material is not short-circuited, the applied stress induces a voltage across the material.
 
Dickfore said:
It seems you missed the third sentence in the article you were reading.

I see now. That seems to rule out the ridiculous mountain scenario. So if you can't close the circuit then how is it used to power devices like when it is put in peoples shoes?
 
Because the stress is variable in time, constantly creating new charges on the plates of the capacitor.
 
superpaul3000 said:
I see now. That seems to rule out the ridiculous mountain scenario. So if you can't close the circuit then how is it used to power devices like when it is put in peoples shoes?

Hi Paul. The trick is that these piezoelectric devices can only displace the charge in the circuit by a very small amount, so that rules out the possibility of providing the constant DC current that you envisage.

Note however that you can get useful amounts of high frequency AC current flow even with very small displacement of charge! So that's the catch, you can't use them to deliver constant power under a static load (like your "under a mountain" example), you have to continually alternate (or pulsate) the mechanical stress in order to obtain useful output power.

I hope that helps.
 
uart said:
Hi Paul. The trick is that these piezoelectric devices can only displace the charge in the circuit by a very small amount, so that rules out the possibility of providing the constant DC current that you envisage.

Note however that you can get useful amounts of high frequency AC current flow even with very small displacement of charge! So that's the catch, you can't use them to deliver constant power under a static load (like your "under a mountain" example), you have to continually alternate (or pulsate) the mechanical stress in order to obtain useful output power.

I hope that helps.

Ok that makes a lot more sense. I think that was my understanding I guess the article just confused me. I'll update it to make that more explicit. This is a cool effect. I wonder if it can convert atomic scale kinetic energy into electricity like it can do with macro scale kinetic energy. Like if there was a wall of nano sized Piezoelectric plates that an air molecule could bounce off and some of that momentum would be converted into electricity. Is that possible? If so I wonder if it could be used to take thermal energy out of the air. That way I can chill the beer in my cooler and run my laptop of that energy at the beach. :)
 
superpaul3000 said:
I'll update it to make that more explicit.
Please do not update anything since it is obvious you are incompetent to do so.
 
Dickfore said:
Please do not update anything since it is obvious you are incompetent to do so.

Well that's the great thing about wikipedia. Check out what I wrote and fix it if you see anything wrong. Just because I'm incompetent doesn't mean I'm always wrong. So what do you think, is the cooler idea not possible?
 
superpaul3000 said:
Ok that makes a lot more sense. I think that was my understanding I guess the article just confused me. I'll update it to make that more explicit. This is a cool effect. I wonder if it can convert atomic scale kinetic energy into electricity like it can do with macro scale kinetic energy. Like if there was a wall of nano sized Piezoelectric plates that an air molecule could bounce off and some of that momentum would be converted into electricity. Is that possible? If so I wonder if it could be used to take thermal energy out of the air. That way I can chill the beer in my cooler and run my laptop of that energy at the beach. :)

This concept is already in use at the macro-level in piezoelectric microphones. So, it won't cool your beer but you can rock with it! :biggrin:
 
  • #10
superpaul3000 said:
I was reading the wiki article on Piezoelectricity and this effect is either really odd or I'm missing something obvious here (I know wikipedia is not the best source but I'm feeling lazy)

My experience - Wikipedia is worthless if you're trying to learn something of any complexity. If you already know it, but have forgotten the formula's,etc., it can be right handy.
 
  • #11
DavidSullivan said:
This concept is already in use at the macro-level in piezoelectric microphones. So, it won't cool your beer but you can rock with it! :biggrin:

That much I know. The difference between the two examples being that sound waves create mechanical stress large enough to produce voltages big enough to have detectable currents given the resistances we are dealing with. The voltage from an air molecule bouncing off the piezoelectric device is minuscule. I think the problem with the piezoelectric cooler is that R>>V and thus current is negligible. What if we had a room temperature superconducting closed circuit, could we charge a superconducting battery (not chemical) on that and cool the air as well?
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Actually a total closed superconducting circuit is not necessary. I guess it must be superconducting from the capacitor plates surrounding the piezoelectric material, through a transformer that can step it up to some usable voltage, and up to the electrodes. Then you can apply any load.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
68
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K