How does light reflection work on smooth surfaces?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ValenceE
  • Start date Start date
ValenceE
Messages
142
Reaction score
0
Hello to all,

while I’m waiting for my reservation of Richard Feynman’s QED book to be available at the local library, here’s a question about light reflection …

Could someone please explain the process by which an incident ray of light is reflected in exactly the same angle after its interaction with a smooth reflective surface ?


Regards,


VE
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The phase of the incident plane wave is given by exp(ik.r).
The phase of the reflected plane wave is given by exp(ik'.r).
In order for the boundary conditions at the interface to hold on the entire surface, k'.r must equal k.r, where r is in the plane of the surface.
The vector dot product k.r=kr\cos\theta, where \theta is the angle between k and r. k and the reflected wave number k' are equal in magnitude, so cos\theta=cos\theta'.
[Note: this angle \theta is (90 degrees - the "incident angle").]
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top