Question about Scanned Transcripts

  • Thread starter Thread starter xdrgnh
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Many physics Ph.D. applications specify the need for scanned transcripts, leading to confusion about whether electronic copies suffice. While some believe that printing and scanning the electronic copy is unnecessary, it is suggested that schools typically prefer transcripts sent directly from the issuing institution. Historically, unofficial copies could be submitted during the application process, but official transcripts were required upon admission acceptance. To avoid any issues, contacting the school for clarification on their specific requirements is recommended.
xdrgnh
Messages
415
Reaction score
0
I have electronic copies of my official transcript with the school name, phone number logo and everything on them. However in a lot of physics Ph.D applications they are referring to scans. Do they really want me to print my electronic copy and then scan it and upload the scan rather then the original electronic copy. That seems incredibly pedantic.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would they really know the difference?
 
Call them and ask.

In my experience most schools prefer to have transcripts forwarded directly from the institution that granted the degree.
 
I suspect that those instructions are "left over" from the days when printed transcripts were the norm. IIRC one could often submit an unofficial photocopy or a scan of a transcript with the application. This would contain only the courses taken up to that time and therefore was incomplete. If the grad school offered you admission and you accepted it, then you had to ensure that your undergrad school sent an official transcript after you actually completed your degree. If this was not done, your admission would be canceled.

I agree that you should e-mail or call the school and ask for a clarification.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
742
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top