Question about shear flow / stress

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of shear flow and shear stress in a structural context, specifically regarding the determination of the shear force (QB) in relation to different board configurations. Participants explore the implications of using different boards for calculations and the conditions under which certain methods yield correct or incorrect results.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why QB should not be calculated using only the red part of the board in contact with another board.
  • Others assert that the full area of the connected part must be used when determining QB for bolt shear.
  • There is a discussion about why the center board is preferred for calculations over the left or right boards, with one participant noting that using the center board simplifies the calculation by reducing the number of shear planes considered.
  • One participant expresses concern that the method of using the center board may only be valid due to the equal dimensions of the boards involved.
  • Another participant elaborates on the differences in shear flow calculations between two parts of a problem, emphasizing the need to consider the area between nailed joints and the centroid's vertical distance to the neutral axis for accurate results.
  • There is a mention of an alternative method that involves using the area outside of the top cuts, which requires careful consideration of the full area and centroid distance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate method for calculating QB, with some supporting the use of the center board while others highlight potential issues with this approach in different scenarios. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best method to apply in varying conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the dimensions of the boards and the configuration of the shear planes significantly affect the calculations, indicating that assumptions about uniformity may not hold in all cases.

fonseh
Messages
521
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


For QB , why shouldn't the QB = red part only ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Is there anything wrong with the solution given ?
Since When we 'cut ' the boards , the b is the red part which in contact with the other board , right ? [/B]
 

Attachments

  • 511.PNG
    511.PNG
    68.6 KB · Views: 441
  • 512.PNG
    512.PNG
    23.1 KB · Views: 491
Physics news on Phys.org
fonseh said:

Homework Statement


For QB , why shouldn't the QB = red part only ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Is there anything wrong with the solution given ?
Since When we 'cut ' the boards , the b is the red part which in contact with the other board , right ? [/B]
Nothing wrong with solution. Remember when determining bolt shear, use the full area of connected part when determining Q.
 
Sorry to bump this but when finding QB why can we not use one of the boards on the left or right? Why the center board?
 
Raeksis said:
Sorry to bump this but when finding QB why can we not use one of the boards on the left or right? Why the center board?
You can do it that way and get the same result without having to divide by 2 when you use the center board, because now there is just one shear plane instead of 2 when using the first method.
 
PhanthomJay said:
You can do it that way and get the same result without having to divide by 2 when you use the center board, because now there is just one shear plane instead of 2 when using the first method.
But I was thinking that only works here because the boards are the same dimensions.

In a question like this below (b), if I use one of the side boards I get a different (wrong) answer than if I use the center board.

main-qimg-28763a636910916c63557f31d77183d8?convert_to_webp=true.png
 
Raeksis said:
But I was thinking that only works here because the boards are the same dimensions.

In a question like this below (b), if I use one of the side boards I get a different (wrong) answer than if I use the center board.

View attachment 196206
Part b is a bit more tricky than part a because in part b, the longitudinal shear flow across the nail is into the plane of the page (z direction) on the yz side face of a cubic element, in contrast to part a where the longitudinal shear flow across the nail is into the plane of the page (z direction) on the xz top face of a cubic element. Consequently, in part b, the shear flow is horizontally distributed across the top board, so you need to find Q based on the area of the board in between the nailed joints, and the vertical distance from its centroid to the neutral axis. Then divide result by 2 when determining shear flow, because there are 2 shear planes.
Alternatively, you could use the Q of the area outside of the top cuts, but when so doing, you must use the full area , that is, the area of both vertical pieces times the vertical distance of its centroid to the neutral axis. This a more tedious way of finding it.
Part b is a stronger connection than part a, because the Q in part b is less.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K