Question about simple algebraic exponential property

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 2K views
zell_D
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
I haven't been taking math for 3 years so I have a question about the following:

is 14m6n2 the same as 2mn x 7m5n

basically asking this because I am not sure whether or not I can factor the terms out like this

if this information is insufficient I can post the whole problem. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not the same

[tex]14^{m^6 n^2} = (2 x 7)^{m^6 n^2} = 2^{m^6 n^2} 7^{m^6 n^2}[/tex]
 
ok so then i do not know how i would arrive at the right answer:

14m6n2 / 2mn

i know what the right answer is, and i know how they did it. but i can't seem to grasp the reasoning

PS: the answer is 7m5n

I was under the impression that you can only subtract the powers through the same base, but apparently i was wrong over here?

or are numbers different than variables?
 
They behave in the same manner, but you know more properties of them. A variable can be any number.

For example, "songoku" manipulated 14 to read (2*7). You probably already know that [tex](ab)^{n}=a^{n}b^{n}[/tex]. Thus, we can write:

[tex]\frac{14^{m^{6}n^{2}}}{2^{mn}}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{(2*7)^{m^{6}n^{2}}}{2^{mn}}=\frac{2^{m^{6}n^{2}}*7^{m^{6}n^{2}}}{2^{mn}}}[/tex].

Is this equal to [tex]7^{m^{5}n}[/tex]?
 
i know with the same base i can reduce, but i don't get 7m5n
 
maybe you can post the whole question?
 
i did:
its

14m6n2 / 2mn

and the answer being 7m5n
 
If so, the answer is wrong

Just check it : let m = 1 and n = 2

[tex]\frac{14^{m^6 n^2}}{2^{mn}} = \frac{14^4}{2^2} = 9604[/tex]

[tex]7^{m^5n} = 7^2 = 49[/tex]
 
Last edited:
So it looks like you really have [tex]\frac{14m^6} {2mn}[/tex] and the simplified answer is [tex]\frac{7m^5} {n}[/tex]

This should be a lot easier for you to do than what you were doing.
 
only thing i can guess is that the book is wrong, the number substitution proves this