Question about spinor wavefunction

Orion_PKFD
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
The question is the following:
At one instant, the electron in a hydrogen atom is in the state:

|phi>=sqrt(2/7) |E_2,1,-1,+> + 1/sqrt(7) |E_1,0,0,-> - sqrt(2/7) |E_1,0,0,+>

Express the state |phi> in the position representation, as a spinor wavefunction


How am I supposed to do this?

Some help would be very appreciated!:shy:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Get your script with the Dirac wave functions

\psi_{E_2,1,-1,+}(r) = <r|E_2, 1, -1, +>

etc. and calculate the sum.

Or do you have to solve the hydrogen atom problem first?
 
That is only a part of the state in the position representation, not the spinor wavefunction.
 
what is the difference? can you give us an example what your problem really is? do you already know the solutions (wavefunctions) for the hydrogen atom?
 
The idea here is representing the state as a spinor wavefunction. The solutions are known and don't matter for the case, all you need to do is use the spinor representation.

The exercise is exactly the one I wrote above. From Principles of Quantum Mechanics by Hans C. Ohanian.
 
I do not see your problem.

Can you post the three spinor wave functions and explain what you do not understand?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top