Question about supernova kinetic energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the kinetic energy of a supernova explosion and the volume of interstellar gas swept up by the ejecta. The kinetic energy is derived using the virial theorem, although it's noted that this theorem is more applicable on larger scales rather than near a supernova. The user is confused about determining the swept volume as the outflow velocity decreases. The importance of using kinematical models for accurate calculations in this context is emphasized. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
lr1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A9: Supernova Remnants
Consider a supernova explosion in the outer 4M⊙ of a dying star, ejected at a speed of 5000 km/s.
a ◮ What is the kinetic energy of the expanding ejecta?
b ◮ The ejecta are slowed by sweeping up the local interstellar gas. Assuming the density of the interstellar gas
is ig = 2 × 10−19 kg/m3, how large a volume will be swept up by the time the outflow velocity has decreased
to 10 km/s? HINT: Assume the KE of the expansion is conserved.
A10:
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi lr1! welcome to pf! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)

show us what you've tried, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help! :smile:
 
Part a I used virial theorem for kinetic energy 3mv^2 and for part b I used mass= density / volume but am confused with swept volume
 
Virial theorem is only useful on large scales, for a region near a supernova event you still need to use kinematical models.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top