Question about the atomic structure of insulators

AI Thread Summary
Atoms with 7 or 8 electrons in their outer shell are considered ideal for insulators because they achieve a stable electron configuration, minimizing the likelihood of electron movement. A higher number of outer electrons does not necessarily improve insulating properties, as the energy required to free an electron increases with more electrons sharing the energy load. The maximum number of electrons per shell is determined by the formula 2n², and while theoretical limits exist, practical observations have not exceeded 32 electrons in natural atoms. The conductivity of materials is influenced by their bonding structure, with metallic bonds allowing for free electron movement, while covalent and ionic bonds do not. Overall, the understanding of electron distribution and energy absorption in insulators is more complex than simply dividing energy among outer electrons.
theelectrician
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm an apprentice electrician taking night courses. My question isn't a specific mathematical problem. It's a query about a concept. Please let me know if there's a better way/place I can ask it.

My text say that atoms can have a max of 32 electrons per shell, with 1-3 being ideal for conductors, and 7 or 8 being ideal for insulators. My understanding is that when a valence electron is bumped from its shell, if there is only one electron in that shell, it will take on all of the energy. if there are two electrons in that shell, each will take on half. If an insulator has eight electrons in the outer shell, the energy will be split eight ways. Please tell me if this understanding is correct.

My questions:

Why are 7 or 8 ideal numbers for an insulator? If you had 20 electrons in the outer shell, and the energy was divided into twentieths, wouldn't that be a better insulator? Why isn't the best insulator an atom that has 32 electrons in its outer shell, thereby dividing the energy 32 ways?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My text say that atoms can have a max of 32 electrons per shell
That is not true. Shell n has space for 2n2 electrons. In the ground state (!), for all natural atoms and all atoms produced so far, the actual number does not exceed 32, where element 126 could be an atom to exceed this number - but so far, we just discovered the elements up to 118.

with 1-3 being ideal for conductors, and 7 or 8 being ideal for insulators.
Where does that come from? Atoms with a small number of outer electrons tend to need lower energies to free an electron, but that depends on the binding structure in solids. Metallic bonds usually give a good conductivity, covalent and ionic bonds give a bad one (as they do not have free electrons).
I guess that statement just refers to s and p orbitals - and then you can have a maximum of 8 in the outermost shell.

My understanding is that when a valence electron is bumped from its shell, if there is only one electron in that shell, it will take on all of the energy. if there are two electrons in that shell, each will take on half. If an insulator has eight electrons in the outer shell, the energy will be split eight ways. Please tell me if this understanding is correct.
No.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top