Question about the energy of an electron orbiting the nucleaus

  • Thread starter Thread starter MohdAziz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Energy
AI Thread Summary
Calculating the energy of an electron in a hydrogen atom using classical mechanics yields results of the correct order of magnitude but lacks precision due to the quantum nature of atomic systems. The Coulombic force calculated is approximately 8.221 x 10^-8 N, leading to a velocity of about 2.184 x 10^6 m/s for the electron. The kinetic energy derived is approximately 2.36 x 10^-18 J, which is accurate in terms of magnitude. However, the potential energy calculation is incorrect; it should use the formula qV instead of qE, resulting in a potential energy that is negative and twice the kinetic energy. Overall, while the approach provides a basic understanding, quantum mechanics is necessary for more precise calculations.
MohdAziz
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I have a difficulty calculating the energy of an electron orbiting a nucleus, let's say we have a a hydrogen atom, there is only one electron orbiting around the proton. And since the radius never changes.
r = 5.29 x 10^-11 m
charge (qp) of proton= 1.60 x 10^-19 Coulumbs
charge (qe) of electron= -1.60 x 10^-19 Coulumbs
mass proton= 1.67 x 10^-27 kg
mass electron= 9.11 x 10^-31 kg

F = k (charge of proton) (charge of electron)/ (r^2)

If you solve for the Coulombic force, you get that it is approximately 8.221 * 10^-8 N.

This is equal to the centripetal force of any object in uniform circular motion: m(v^2)/r
Therefore:

8.221 * 10^-8 = (mass of the electron) v^2/ (r)
v^2 = 4.773 * 10^12
v is approximately 2.184 * 10^6 m/s

And after that to find the total enegry which is equal to total energy = U + KE

KE = 1/2 * m v^2 = 1/2 * 9.901 * 10^-31 * (2.183 * 10^6)^2 = 2.36 * 10^-18.

U = qE, E ( produced by the proton) = kcq/r^2 thus E = 5.141 * 10^11
thus U = qe = 8.226 * 10-8 J

Is my answer correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, note that the electron in a hydrogen atom can only be treated properly with quantum mechanics, and it's quantum mechanics that let's you derive the atomic radius. If we're given the radius, your calculation will give an answer of the right order of magnitude. But you can't hope for more accuracy than that, because you are doing classical mechanics, not quantum mechanics.

Your kinetic energy is indeed the right order of magnitude, assuming your answer is in Joules (units are important!).

You are using the wrong formula for potential energy. qE is the force on a charge, not its potential energy. The potential energy is given by qV, where the potential V of a point charge is kq/r. You should end up with a potential energy equal to -2 times the kinetic energy.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top