Question about the formation of a massive star

  • Thread starter Thread starter ldc3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formation Star
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the formation of massive stars, specifically questioning how stars of extreme mass, like 1,000,000 solar masses, could exist given the effects of stellar winds that clear surrounding gas and dust once fusion begins. It is noted that the maximum size of stars is likely around 200 solar masses, influenced by the metallicity of their progenitor material, with early universe stars being more massive due to lower metal content. The Eddington Limit is highlighted as a critical factor that restricts star mass due to the balance between gravitational forces and radiation pressure from fusion. The example of Betelgeuse illustrates the misconception about size versus mass, as it is significantly larger than the Sun but only about 20 times its mass. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexities and limitations in the formation of massive stars.
ldc3
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I have no problem with description of a small star's formation by gas and dust accretion.
The problem I have is with a massive star. When enough material has accumulated to start the fusion of the star, a stellar wind will start and will clear away the gas and dust nearby. A heavier star would produce a stronger stellar wind. Even with a high density nebula, I would think that there wouldn't be enough material accumulated before the fusion started pushing away the gas and dust.
So, how does a star of 1,000,000 solar masses form?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
There are no stars of 10^6 solar masses, and there probably never were. The maximum size star that's possible is probably in the several hundred solar mass range.
 
Something around 200 solar masses is believed to be about as big as any star can get and is affected by metallicity of its progenitor material, meaning stars in the very early universe tended to be more massive because the progenitor material was metal poor.
 
ldc3 said:
The problem I have is with a massive star. When enough material has accumulated to start the fusion of the star, a stellar wind will start and will clear away the gas and dust nearby.
That's basically the limiting factor to the maximum mass of stars. Its called the Eddington Limit.

Also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddington_luminosity
 
OK so I overestimated the size of a massive star. It's just that when you see Betelgeuse pictured beside our sun (and it looks about 1000000 times larger, one assumes it has 1000000 times the mass as well.

"A radius of 5.5 AU is roughly 1,180 times the radius of the Sun—a sphere so huge that it could contain over 2 quadrillion Earths (2.15 × 10^15) or more than 1.6 billion (1.65 × 10^9) suns."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betelgeuse
 
Note that the same article says that Betegeuse has about 20x the mass of the sun.
 
Idc3, now you got it right. The same Wikipedia article says "In volume, Betelgeuse exceeds the Sun by a factor of about 1.6 billion. Yet the actual mass of the star is believed to be no more than 18 to 19 Suns".
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top