How Do You Calculate the Acceleration of Buckets Using Tension and Mass?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of two buckets of nails being pulled up by a rope, focusing on the roles of tension and mass in the context of Newton's laws of motion. Participants explore the forces acting on the buckets, including gravitational force and tension, and how these relate to acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the problem of calculating acceleration using the total mass of the two buckets and the tension in the rope.
  • Another participant suggests focusing on the lower bucket to simplify the analysis of forces and acceleration.
  • Several participants discuss the net force acting on the lower bucket, identifying tension and gravitational force as key components.
  • There is a clarification that the normal force is equivalent to the tension in the string for the lower bucket.
  • Some participants express confusion about why the total mass is not used in their calculations, leading to further exploration of the distribution of mass and forces.
  • Participants engage in deriving the relationship between net force and acceleration, with different formulations presented.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to analyze the forces acting on the lower bucket, but there is no consensus on the necessity of using the total mass in the calculations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to take in this scenario.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the total mass is distributed across the two buckets, and any equations involving total mass would require treating the buckets as a unit. There is also mention of the tension in the string above the top bucket, which is not provided in the problem.

Ronel
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Two buckets of nails are hung one above the other and are pulled up to a roof by a rope. Each bucket has a mass of 5.0kg. The tension in the rope connecting the buckets is 60 N. Calculate the acceleration of the buckets.

So here's what I did:

mt= ma + mb (m which is equal to mass)
mt= 5.0kg + 5.0kg
mt= 10.0 kg (total mass is 10.0kg)

Fnet= Fn + Fg
ma= Fn + mg

if i isolate the a it would be:

a= (Fn/m) + g

How do I find the Normal force to solve the question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Clue: forget about the upper bucket and just think about the forces and acceleration of the lower bucket.
 
haruspex said:
Clue: forget about the upper bucket and just think about the forces and acceleration of the lower bucket.
still don't get it please elaborate it
 
Make a force equation of the lower bucket. Which are the forces acting on it? Due to the string(tension)? due to earth? how is the net force on it related to its acceleration, then?
 
forcers that are acting on it are. Fn and Fg. I don't know what to do with the tension its a big question for me. Net force = ma
 
Fn in your post #5, IS the tension in the string...You should probably call it FT

Net force F_{net} = ma

But, what is F_{net} in terms of Fn and Fg??

remember, this is only for the lower bucket.
 
Oh thanks for the tension thing.
I think the Fnet is=T+mg ?
 
Ronel said:
Oh thanks for the tension thing.
I think the Fnet is=T+mg ?

But tension is acting upwards, mg is acting downwards, and Fnet, I'll leave to you. :wink:
 
Oh ok now i got it, is this right? Fnet= T-mg
 
  • #10
Ronel said:
Oh ok now i got it, is this right? Fnet= T-mg

Yep. :approve:

Now use the relation with acceleration.
 
  • #11
a= Fnet/m Ok i used the 5 kg and I got the answer. But I have one quick question how come I didnt use the total mass?

Thank You man ! :)

But I could also do this

Fnet=T-mg
ma=T-mg
when I isolate acceleration -->> a=Ft-(mg)/m Instead of a=Ft/m ( both correct)

Thank You so much man :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Ronel said:
a= Fnet/m right? Ok i used the 5 kg and I got the answer.

Great! :biggrin:

But I have one quick question how come I didnt use the total mass?

Why would you use something when you don't need it? :wink: Its simply not necessary to use the total mass for the situation you are given.

But I could also do this

Fnet=T-mg
ma=T-mg
when I isolate acceleration -->> a=Ft-(mg)/m I still got the right answer

That basically is using a = Fnet/m :wink: You just jumbled with terms to get there, in this answer.

PS : Post such questions in homework section, next time!
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Ronel said:
But I have one quick question how come I didnt use the total mass?
The total mass is distributed across two buckets. If you want an equation involving the total mass then you'll need to treat the two buckets as a unit. So then you want the net force on that unit. That will be sum of the two gravitational forces, downwards, against the tension in the string above the top bucket acting upwards. But you are not told the tension in that part of the string, so it doesn't get you far.
You can view the question as an exercise in figuring out which pieces of information are useful and which aren't.
 
  • #14
haruspex said:
The total mass is distributed across two buckets. If you want an equation involving the total mass then you'll need to treat the two buckets as a unit. So then you want the net force on that unit. That will be sum of the two gravitational forces, downwards, against the tension in the string above the top bucket acting upwards. But you are not told the tension in that part of the string, so it doesn't get you far.
You can view the question as an exercise in figuring out which pieces of information are useful and which aren't.
Thank You so much :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K