Question about work, energy and the work energy theorem.

AI Thread Summary
A mass is placed on a frictionless ramp and then encounters a rough patch before reaching another frictionless ramp, prompting a question about the height it reaches on the second ramp. The discussion centers on applying the work-energy theorem and understanding the forces at play, particularly friction and gravity. The key equation used is -µmgd = mgh_2 - mgh_1, which relates the work done against friction to the change in gravitational potential energy. Clarifications are sought regarding whether to account for the work done by gravity on both ramps. Ultimately, the consensus is that the initial calculations are correct and that gravity's work has been appropriately considered.
Ethan_Tab
Messages
57
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


So a mass m is placed on a ramp at a height given by h_1. This portion of the trip is frictionless. Then, at the bottom of the ramp the mass encounters a rough patch of levelled ground with a µk given my µ. This strip has a length of size "d" meters. After traveling across this surface, the mass encounters yet again, another frictionless ramp. The question wants to know how far up the second ramp the ball will get. Call this variable h_2. There were no ø given for either of the two ramps.

Homework Equations


ΔE=W
GPE=mgh
KE=½mv^2
W+KE_1+GPE_1=KE_2+GPE_2+E_loss (due to friction)
KE_1=0
KE_2=0 (when it reaches it max height on the second hill)

The Attempt at a Solution


If someone could confirm this or explain why this is incorrect it would be very helpful.

Im thinking,
Since W=F*D and I know the only force acting against the ball is that of friction (negative work), can I equate that to ΔGPE?

So; -µmgd=mgh_2-mgh_1
-µd+h_1=h_2

But now that I think about it, would there also be work done by the x component of gravity when the ball is rolling down and up the first and second hills? If anyone could clarify this it would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your solution looks correct to me.
Ethan_Tab said:
But now that I think about it, would there also be work done by the x component of gravity when the ball is rolling down and up the first and second hills?
Could you elaborate upon this? I am not entirely sure what you are confused about.
 
AlephNumbers said:
Your solution looks correct to me.

Could you elaborate upon this? I am not entirely sure what you are confused about.

Can I just assume all work done is that which the mass encountered when it slid across the rough patch of length "d" or do I have to count for the work done by gravity when the mass was on both ramps?
 
Ethan_Tab said:
-µmgd=mgh_2-mgh_1

It looks like you did account for it.

Gravity is a conservative force. The work done on the mass by the force of gravity is equal to the change in kinetic energy of the mass; W = ΔK
 
  • Like
Likes Ethan_Tab
AlephNumbers said:
It looks like you did account for it.

Gravity is a conservative force. The work done on the mass by the force of gravity is equal to the change in kinetic energy of the mass; W = ΔK

Oh! I see! Thanks for the help :smile:.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top