Question - Atmospheric Perspective

AI Thread Summary
Atmospheric perspective causes distant objects to appear lighter due to the scattering and absorption of light by air particles. In a vacuum, such as outer space, this effect largely does not apply because there is no atmosphere to scatter light. However, space dust can create a similar visual effect under certain conditions. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding atmospheric effects in relation to distance and visibility. Overall, atmospheric perspective is primarily an Earth-bound phenomenon influenced by the atmosphere.
hannaheart13
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello! Please excuse me if I posted this in the wrong place. I've never been too good at these forum things, but I did have a question about atmospheric perspective that I believe has more to do with physics than any other category on the forum.

While doing a personal artistic study on perspective, I came to learn that the reason objects further in space appear lighter in hue is because of the friction in the air that the light particles have to travel through. Therefore, the more air the light has to travel through, the lighter the object in the distance appears. This made me wonder, if I were to look at an object in a frictionless vacuum such as outer space, would atmospheric perspective still apply to what I'm seeing? My initial thought would be "no", but then I really wasn't sure. Being raised on Earth, it's hard to imagine looking at objects in the distance where atmospheric perspective wouldn't apply. So what do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

That's not quite it. The atmosphere isn't completely transparent even when it looks like it over short distances. So the further away something is, the more light from it is absorbed or reflected and the more light from other directions is reflected toward you. It is exactly like looking through fog.

In space, this phenomena mostly doesn't apply, but there are times when space dust will provide a similar effect.
 
Oh yes, that actually makes perfect sense! Seems like something that should have been obvious since the word atmosphere is a key component there haha. Oh well :) Thank you for the information!
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
5K
Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
22K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top