Question bout normal distribution:

semidevil
Messages
156
Reaction score
2
so w/ the normal distribution, to find the area between 2 numbers, say P(a \leq Z \leq b),, I need to split this up into 2:

P(-\infty < z \leq b) - P(-\infty < z < a).

my question is, why is it not P(a < z < +\infty)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could do it that way, if you had tables of values for P(a < z < +\infty), but mostly things are tabulated the other way.

Also:

P(a < z < +\infty) = 1 - Pr(-\infty < z < a)
 
Last edited:
James R said:
You could do it that way, if you had tables of values for P(a < z < +\infty), but mostly things are tabulated the other way.

Also:

P(a < z < +\infty) = 1 - Pr(-\infty < z < a)


so I'm getting confused. I have a question regarding storage space and shipment. they are asking what is the probability that the next shipment will be enough, but at the same time, not overflow the storage space.

so basically a < z < b. so in my problem, it has to be 1279.5 \leq Z < 1310.5

so first, I break it up, and do 1279.5 < Z < \infty.

on the second part, do I do -\infty &lt; z &lt; 1310.5 or do I do 1279.5 < z < 1310.5 [/tex]

to me, I think the second one is right...but the way the book is doing it, it seems like it is sayingi f I want to know between a and b, I need to -inf < z < b and also -inf < z < a, which doesn't make that much sense...
 
i f I want to know between a and b, I need to -inf < z < b and also -inf < z < a, which doesn't make that much sense...

Maybe there's a way to use those two quantities to determine what you want to know.
 
Think of the probability as the area under the bell curve. You want the area between a and b. You have the area between negative infinity and a, and between negative infinity and b. So...
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Back
Top