Question Concerning Superposition

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicshelp123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Superposition
physicshelp123
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm wondering if a system regains its superposition after it's observed or if it remains a definite value forever after observation. Also, if a system does regain its superposition, does it occur instantly after it's done being measured?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could regard the arrival of a train as a superposition until the train is seen to arrive.
It's having arrived, either you get on to the train if that was the plan, or maybe you meet somebody getting off it.
The train cannot return to the state of having not yet arrived.
 
The state is always in some superposition..
If it is a single eigenstate of one observable, it may be in a superposition of multiple eigenstates of another observable.

If you measure an observable of a particle, its wavefunction can be said to collapse to a single eigenstate of that observable.

Before and after that, the state evolves according to how its energy depends on its position, momentum, and other observables (i.e., its Hamiltonian).

If a particular observable is a conserved quantity (commutes with the Hamiltonian), and you measure that observable, the state after measurement will always be the same eigenstate of that observable.

If the observable is not conserved (does not commute with the hamiltonian), then after a sufficient time, the state will be in a reasonable superposition of multiple eigenstates of the observable in question.

Another way of looking at it:
The uncertainty principle tells us that a particle cannot at the same time be in a single eigenstate of all ovservables.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes bhobba
physicshelp123 said:
I'm wondering if a system regains its superposition after it's observed or if it remains a definite value forever after observation. Also, if a system does regain its superposition, does it occur instantly after it's done being measured?

The system doesn't return to its previous state. The measurement puts it in an eigenstate of whatever we're measuring. After the measurement the state evolves forward from there according to Schrodinger's equation.

That evolution may put it into a new superposition or it may leave whatever we measured in a definite value forever (or at least until the next interaction disturbs it); this depends on whether the observable commutes with the Hamiltonian or not.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
124
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
143
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top