Question: Conservation of Momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the original speed of two spacecraft before they were separated, using conservation of momentum principles. The final momenta of each spacecraft were calculated, resulting in values of 1.8 x 10^7 kg.m/s for spacecraft 1 and 1.6 x 10^7 kg.m/s for spacecraft 2. The angle between their momentum vectors was determined to be 169°, and the total initial momentum was found to be 3.4 x 10^7 kg.m/s. The combined mass of the spacecraft before separation was 36,000 kg, leading to an initial velocity of 944 m/s. The conversation highlights the importance of clarity in vector calculations and significant figures in physics problems.
roane
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm not very confident with my final answer for this question, wondering where I might have gone off track...

2 spacecraft are thrust apart, what was the original speed of the 2 craft when they were linked together?

Mass spacecraft 1 = 1.9 x 10^4kg
Velocity spacecraft 1 after separation is 3.5 x 10^3 km/h @ 5.1º [NE]

Mass spacecraft 2 = 1.7 x 10^4kg
Velocity spacecraft 2 after separation is 3.4 x 10^3 km/h @ 5.9º [SE]

For spacecraft 1
p = m*v
p = 1.8 x 10^7 kg.m/s

For spacecraft 2
p = m*v
p = 1.6 x 10^7 kg.m/s

The first vector is 1.8 x 10^7 kg.m/s @ 5.1 [NE]
The second vector is 1.6 x 10^7 kg.m/s @ 5.9 [SE]
The angle between these 2 vectors is 169º.

Using law of cosines...
c^2 = (1.8 x 10^7)^2+(1.6 x 10^7)^2 -[2(1.8 x 10^7)(1.6 x 10^7)cos(169)]
c^2 = 3.24 x 10^14 + 2.56 x 10^14 -[2(2.88 x 10^14)cos(169)]
c^2 = 5.8 x 10^14 + 5.7 x 10^14
c^2 = 11.5 x 10^14

c = 3.4 x 10^7kg.m/s

Final momentum = Initial momentum
p = m.v
and combined mass before separation is 36000kg
3.4 x 10^7kg.m/s = 36000kg.v

v = 944m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums :smile:

I really don't follow your derivation, in particular:

  • Are the angles 5.1° and 5.9° taken from the x axis or the y axis?
  • I don't see the significance of c here. I get that it's supposed to be the difference between the momenta of the two spacecraft , but that isn't useful in any way I'm aware of.

That being said -- the usual way to solve these problems is to set up two equations, expressing the conservation of momentum in the x and y directions. This will give you the x and y components of the initial velocity.
 
Hi, thanks for responding!

My thinking was...first I'd calculate the total final momentum of each craft after separation.

Then create a diagram of the vector addition and use Law of Cosines where the resultant would be the "c" variable.

The arrow representing P after separation of the first craft would be 5.1° below the x-axis.
The arrow representing P after separation of the second craft would be 5.9° above the x-axis.
The angle between the 2 vectors is 169°

Since initial momentum = final momentum, the resultant here will equal total initial momentum which I arrived at 3.4 x 10^7kg.m/s

And two masses combined before separation is 36000kg

3.4 x 10^7kg.m/s = 36000kg.v

v = 944m/s
 
Ah, now I understand. Your answer looks pretty good, though there may be some roundoff error. You might try expressing your intermediate calculations in 3 significant figures, then round off to the correct sig figs at the very end.
 
OK, Thanks so much!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top