Question Fluid Mechanics(Robert Granger) fluid Velocity comp.

  • Thread starter Thread starter knockout_artist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluid Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on fluid mechanics equations from Robert Granger's work, specifically equations 4.28 to 4.30, which describe the velocity differences between neighboring points in a fluid flow using velocity gradient components. The subsequent equations, 4.31 to 4.33, introduce a factor of 1/2, prompting a question about its significance. The response clarifies that this factor relates to the resolution of the velocity gradient tensor into components representing vorticity and rate of deformation. The vorticity tensor indicates the rotation rate of fluid elements, while the remaining terms describe the deformation rate without rotation. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for analyzing fluid behavior in mechanics.
knockout_artist
Messages
70
Reaction score
2
Question "Fluid Mechanics(Robert Granger)" fluid Velocity comp.

Chapter 4. eq. 4.28- 4.30

u = u0 + (x - x0)(du/dx) + (y - y0)(du/dy) + (z - z0)(du/dz)

v= ...

w = ...


Then without any significance explanation these equation take a form of
eq 4.31 - 4.33


u = u0 + 1/2 [(x - x0)(du/dx - du/dx ) + (y - y0)(du/dydx - dv/dx) + (z - z0)(du/dz - dw/dx)] ...

v= ...

w = ...


what does this 1/2 in second set of equation means ?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first three equations you wrote expresses the difference in velocity between two neighboring points in a fluid flow in terms of the components of the velocity gradient (tensor) in their immediate vicinity. In the second set of equations you wrote, the velocity gradient (tensor) is resolved into a rotation rate (vorticity tensor) and a rate of deformation. The terms you have given are the components of the vorticity, and tell how rapidly the fluid elements are rotating, while the other terms you have not shown (your 4th equation has ... in it) describe the rate of deformation of the fluid elements, with the rotation removed.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top