Question: How do symmetries and time evolution interact in quantum mechanics?

giova7_89
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
My question is the following: when in quantum mechanics one introduces symmetry, says that a states and observables transform both, in order to mantain mean values intact (kind of like a change of coordinate system), i.e.:

|\psi>\rightarrow U|\psi>

and

O\rightarrow UOU^\dagger

while when one is concerned about time evolution, only states (Schrodinger picture) or observables (heisenberg picture) change?

The first thing to say is that if one doesnt' do that, mean values will never depend on time, which is rather strange..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at the Heisenberg picture.

What you find is an operator equation where the time evolution of an operator O is related to the commutator [H,O] via

\frac{dO}{dt} = i[H,O]

which corresponds to the classical Poisson bracket. From this operator equation of motion one derives the time evolution operator

U(t) = e^{-iHt}

and the time evolution

O(t) = U^\dagger(t)\,O\,U(t)

In the Heisenberg picture the states are constant, i.e. not subject to time evolution generated via U(t), i.e.

|\psi\rangle \stackrel{\text{time}}{\to} |\psi\rangle

O \stackrel{\text{time}}{\to} O(t) = U^\dagger(t)\,O\,U(t)

Calculating expectation values means

\langle O(t) \rangle_\psi = \langle\psi|O(t)|\psi\rangle = \langle\psi|U^\dagger(t)\,O\,U(t)|\psi\rangle

What you are talking about are unitary transformations T(a) generated via hermitian operators Ω

T(a) = e^{-ia\Omega}

But w.r.t. these unitary transformations T(a) both operators and states do change

|\psi\rangle \stackrel{\text{trf}}{\to} |\psi\rangle_a = T^\dagger(a)|\psi\rangle

O(t) \stackrel{\text{trf}}{\to} O_a(t) = T^\dagger(a)\,O(t)\,T(a)

which means that T(a) drops out from expectation values trivially.
 
Last edited:
Yes, I know these mathematics behind that, but my question is why do we do so? I mean, why one says the things you wrote in bold? Is it somehow related to active vs passive transformations?
 
The time evolution U is derived via the Heisenberg equstion of motion, the symmetry transformation T(a) are nothing else but a change of the basis vectors in Hilbert space. The only thing which relates them is the fact that both are unitary transformations.

But U(t) really does something, it transforms O and leaves the states invariant whereas T(a) essentially does nothing, it transforms O but this compensated by the change of the states.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top