Question in Principles of Quantum Mechanics by Shankar

wbphysics
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Im studying a book "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" by Shankar.
Im in the fifth chapter, Simple Problems in One dimension.
In page 169 to 170,
the book says about the standard procedure for finding the fate of the incident wave packet.
But i don't understand why we are finding a(E)=<ψ_E/ψ_I> , ψ_E is a normalized eigenfunction of Hamiltonian and ψ_I is an incident wave packet.
More over, in page 170, Step2, Calculating a(E),
it says a part of integral vanishes since, ψ_I in k space is peaked around k=k_0 and is orthogonal to negative momentum states. (k_0=p_0/h bar)
So, please, if you have Shankar's book, help me please~T.T
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wbphysics said:
But i don't understand why we are finding a(E)=<ψ_E/ψ_I> , ψ_E is a normalized eigenfunction of Hamiltonian and ψ_I is an incident wave packet.
For ##{\phi_n}## forming a complete complete basis, we can write and wave function ##\psi## as
$$
\psi = \sum_n a_n \phi_n
$$
where the ##a_n## are complex coefficients given by
$$
a_n = \langle \phi_n | \psi \rangle
$$
In the present case, things are slightly different because the eigenstates are continuous, instead of discrete, but the approach is the same,
$$
\psi_I = \int a(E) \psi_E \, dE
$$
and, just as in the discrete case above, the function ##a(E)##, which plays the role of the coefficients ##a_n## is found using
$$
a(E) = \langle \psi_E | \psi_I \rangle
$$

wbphysics said:
More over, in page 170, Step2, Calculating a(E),
it says a part of integral vanishes since, ψ_I in k space is peaked around k=k_0 and is orthogonal to negative momentum states. (k_0=p_0/h bar)
##\psi_I## is an incident wave packet starting far to the left of the potential step and traveling to the right. Therefore, in its representation in momentum space, the wave function is only non-zero for positive momentum (otherwise, there would be a component moving to the left) and is chosen to be peaked at ##p_0##, which corresponds to the expectation value of its momentum.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top