Question in rotational motion

AI Thread Summary
In rotational motion, angular acceleration refers to the rate of change of angular velocity, while radial and tangential accelerations are linear components of ordinary acceleration, measured in distance per time squared. For a mass attached to a rotating disk, its speed is determined by the formula v = rω, where r is the radius and ω is the angular velocity, indicating that the mass moves with the same angular velocity as the disk. If the mass is set free to fall while still attached to the disk, its acceleration during the fall will depend on the dynamics of the system, including the effects of gravity and the constraints of the string. The relationship between the disk's motion and the attached mass is crucial for understanding the overall behavior of the system. This discussion highlights the interconnectedness of linear and rotational motion principles.
ehabmozart
Messages
212
Reaction score
0
In rotational motion what is the difference between angular acceleration, radial acceleration and tangential acceleration?? ... Now suppose a rotating disk about its center (axis) rotating and a mass attached to the string of the rotating disk. By what v does it move... Is it just like v-rW... If yes, y does it have the same w.. And suppose it is set free to fall but still attached to the disk, what acceleration would it have during the fall? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi ehabmozart! :smile:
ehabmozart said:
In rotational motion what is the difference between angular acceleration, radial acceleration and tangential acceleration??

radial and tangential acceleration are linear, they are two perpendicular components of the ordinary (linear) acceleration

they are measured in distance per time squared

angular acceleration is measured in angle per time squared :wink:
... Now suppose a rotating disk about its center (axis) rotating and a mass attached to the string of the rotating disk. By what v does it move... Is it just like v-rW... If yes, y does it have the same w.. And suppose it is set free to fall but still attached to the disk, what acceleration would it have during the fall?

you mean the string is wound round the disc at radius r ?

then, if the string isn't slipping, the speed of the string at any point at which it is in contact with the disc must be the same as the speed of that point of the disc

since the speed of the disc (at distance r from the centre, with the centre fixed) is rω, the speed of the string must be rω also :smile:

(if the centre of the disc was moving, with velocity v … for example if the disc was rolling … then of course you would have to add v)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top