Question involving Gas Laws: A 6.0L flask

AI Thread Summary
A 6.0L flask contains a gas mixture of methane, argon, and helium at 45C and 1.75atm, with mole fractions of helium and argon at 0.25 and 0.35, respectively. The mole fraction of methane is calculated to be 0.40, confirming that the total mole fractions equal 1. Using the partial pressure formula, the partial pressure of methane is determined to be 0.7atm. Applying the ideal gas law, the number of moles of methane is calculated as approximately 0.16087. This results in about 9.69 x 10^22 molecules of methane present in the flask.
Chandasouk
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
A 6.0L flask contains a mixture of methane, argon, and helium at 45C and 1.75atm. If the mole fractions of helium and Argon are 0.25 and 0.35, respectively, how many molecules of methane are present?

V = 6.0L

T=318.15K

Ptotal=1.75atm

mole fraction: XHe=0.25

XAr=0.35

XCH4=0.40

Because mole fractions always add up to 1

Then I used Partial Pressure formula

Partial Pressure of CH4 = 0.40 X 1.75atm = 0.7atm

Then Ideal gas law

n=PV/RT

n=(0.7atm)(6L)/(.o8206)(318.15K) = 0.16087 moles of CH4

0.16087 moles of CH4 X 6.022 x 1023 molecules = 9.69 X 10^22 molecules of methane?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks OK. Watch significant digits.

--
methods
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top