I Question on analytic mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the derivation of the kinetic energy expression for a bead moving along a parabolic path defined by y = b*x^2. The key point is that the velocity in the y-direction, y(dot), is derived using the chain rule, leading to y(dot)^2 being expressed as 4*b^2*x^2*x(dot)^2, rather than simply 4*b^2*x^2. This is crucial because it incorporates the time derivative of x, reflecting the bead's motion along the constrained path. The kinetic energy is then formulated as T = 1/2*m*(x(dot)^2*(1 + 4*b^2*x^2)), which accounts for the constraint imposed by the parabola. The discussion concludes that the motion can be analyzed using Lagrange multipliers or by eliminating one degree of freedom due to the constraint.
hagopbul
Messages
397
Reaction score
45
TL;DR Summary
There this example in analytical mechanics which I am not able to understand
Hello :

There is this example ,on analytical mechanics , which I am not able to understand why he solve it in that way

We have a bead moving on a parabola that it's equation is y = b*x^2

Find the equation of motion
Constrain equations :
y=b*x^2
z=0
The bead have only one coordinate call it x ,x(dot)=d(x)/dt, y(dot)=d(y)/dt , z(dot) = d(z)/dt
x(dot)^2 = x(dot)*x(dot)
Kinetic energy:
T = 1/2*m*(x(dot)^2+y(dot)^2+z(dot)^2)
=1/2*mx(dot)^2*(1+4*b^2*x^2)
Here is my question how he reached this above line
Why y(dot)^2 = 4*b^2*x^2*x(dot)^2
Shouldn't y(dot)^2 = 4*b^2*x^2

I am reviewing this class and just not able to find why it is like that

Regards
H
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the dot denotes derivative wrt time and not wrt x. It is just the chain rule of derivatives: ##dy/dt = (dy/dx)(dx/dt)##
 
  • Like
Likes Albertus Magnus and Gavran
The kinetic energy is $$ \frac12m|\vec v|^2 $$ where ## \vec v ## is a vector quantity which can be expressed in Cartesian coordinate system as ## v_x\hat i+v_y\hat j+v_z\hat k ##.
## |\vec v|^2 ## is ## v_x^2+v_y^2+v_z^2 ## and the kinetic energy can be expressed as $$ \frac12m(v_x^2+v_y^2+v_z^2) $$ which is the three dimensional generalization of the kinetic energy. ## v_x ##, ## v_y ## and ## v_z ## are one-dimensional velocities along the ## x ##, ## y ## and ## z ## directions and they can be expressed as ## dx/dt=\dot x ##, ## dy/dt=\dot y ## and ## dz/dt=\dot z ##, respectively.
## dy/dx=2bx ## is not a velocity and $$ \frac12m(\frac{dy}{dx})^2=\frac12m4b^2x^2 $$ can not be kinetic energy.
 
  • Like
Likes Albertus Magnus
In the case of the bead constrained on the parabola, the only forces present is the force of constraint. The motion is two dimensional, however, the constraint ##y-bx^2=0## reduces the configuration space to one dimension, thus we should expect one equation of motion. This problem can be handled with the technique of Lagrange multipliers or one can simply eliminate one degree of freedom by incorporating the constraint explicitly.
The kinetic energy is given by:$$T={m\over 2}({\dot x}^2+{\dot y}^2)={m\over 2}{\dot x}^2(1+4b^2x^2),$$ where the constraint has been used to eliminate ##y##. Since there is no potential or other external forces present the Lagrangian is such that ##L=T##. From the Euler-Lagrange equations we have that:
$$m\ddot x=\dot p={\partial L\over\partial x}=4mb^2x{\dot x}^2.$$ Finding the equation of motion is an easy step form this point.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top