Solving for Levels in a Binary Lattice - Understanding Arithmetic Series

  • Thread starter Thread starter rwinston
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arithmetic Series
AI Thread Summary
To determine the number of levels L in a binary lattice given N values, the relationship between N and L is defined by the arithmetic series formula, where N equals the sum of the first L integers. The formula derived for L is L = (√(8N + 1) - 1) / 2. This contrasts with binary trees, where the number of nodes follows a geometric progression. Understanding this difference is crucial for accurately calculating levels in a binary lattice. The discussion concludes with the successful identification of the formula for L.
rwinston
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hi

I am currently working through the following issue: I am trying to read an list of values which contains the data points for a binomial lattice. If I have a list of N values that describes a binary tree, and I want to find out how many levels deep L the tree is, I can easily do it via the following method, since at each level, the number of nodes in the tree is 2^N-1:<br /> N=2^L-1<br />

<br /> N+1=2^L<br />

<br /> log_2{N}=L<br />

So the number of nodes increases like: 1, 3, 7, 15, 31...But a binary lattice is different - the number of nodes increases like 1,3,6,10,15...i.e. it is an arithmetic sum:

<br /> N = \sum_{i=1}^L i<br />

My issue is: given N, how can I solve for L?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Got it, d'oh!

<br /> L = \frac{\sqrt{8N+1}-1}{2}<br />
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top