Question on correctly interpreting a bra-ket equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on interpreting the bra-ket equation for uncertainty in energy, specifically the term ##(\hat H - \bar E )^2##. It is clarified that this expression can indeed be expanded using binomial expansion, leading to ##\hat H^2 - 2 \bar E \hat H + \bar E^2##, which can be distributed over the state ##|\Phi \rangle##. Additionally, it is confirmed that for an operator ##\hat{H}## acting on its eigenvector, the relation ##\hat H^2 \psi = E^2 \psi## holds true. The user expresses gratitude for the clarification, indicating they can proceed with their calculations. Understanding these notations is crucial for solving quantum mechanics problems related to energy uncertainty.
blaisem
Messages
28
Reaction score
2
I am trying to solve for the uncertainty in energy ##\Delta E## in the following exercise:
$$\Delta E = \sqrt{\langle \Phi | (\hat H - \bar E )^2 | \Phi \rangle}$$
Questions
  1. What does ##(\hat H - \bar E )^2## mean? Is it a simple binomial expansion into ##\hat H^2 - 2 \bar E \hat H + \bar E^2##, which I distribute over ##|\Phi \rangle##?
  2. If that is the case, does ##\hat H^2 \psi = E^2 \psi##?

I'm not inquiring for the full solution. I simply do not understand the notation in order to begin.

Background
In case a broader context is important, here is the full info available to me:
$$\begin{align} \Phi = a_1 \psi _1 &+ a_2 \psi _2 + a_3 \psi _3 \nonumber \\ \hat H &\psi _i = E_i \psi _i \nonumber \\ \langle \psi _i &| \psi _j \rangle = \delta _{ij} \nonumber \end{align}$$
I also normalized ##\Phi## as ##N=\left( \sum_{1}^3 a_{i}^2 \right)^{-1/2}## and solved ##\bar E = \langle \Phi | \hat H | \Phi \rangle = N^2 \sum_i \left( a_i^2 E_i \right) ## in previous exercises.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Yes
2. Consider an operator ##\hat{A}## with an eigenvector-eigenvalue pair ##v, A##. Then ##\hat{A}^{2}v = \hat{A}(\hat{A}\psi) = \hat{A}(Av) = A(\hat{A}v) = A^{2}v##
 
  • Like
Likes blaisem
Perfect! I should be good from here on out. Thanks for the help getting started.
 
  • Like
Likes GwtBc
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top