Question on Definition of Fourier Transform

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the definition of the Fourier Transform as presented in a physics class, where the professor flipped the negative signs in the forward and inverse transform equations. This deviation from standard conventions complicates the use of built-in FFT functions in MATLAB and Mathematica, as well as referencing transform tables. The standard definitions are: \mathcal{F}\left\{x\left(t\right)\right\}(f) = X\left(f\right) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}x\left(t\right)e^{j2\pi f t}dt and \mathcal{F}^{-1}\left\{X\left(f\right)\right\}(t) = x\left(t\right) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}X\left(f\right)e^{-j2\pi f t}df. The discussion concludes that the sign convention is a matter of choice and should be clarified with the professor to avoid confusion in practical applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier Transform and its properties
  • Familiarity with signal processing concepts
  • Knowledge of MATLAB and Mathematica for FFT functions
  • Basic grasp of complex analysis and exponentials
NEXT STEPS
  • Research standard Fourier Transform definitions in signal processing literature
  • Explore MATLAB's FFT function and its implementation details
  • Investigate Mathematica's handling of Fourier Transforms
  • Review common conventions in physics versus engineering for mathematical definitions
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physicists, mathematicians, and anyone involved in signal processing or using Fourier Transforms in computational tools.

nickmai123
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
I have a question, specifically to physics people, on their definition of the Fourier Transform (and its inverse by proxy). I'm an EE and math person, so I've done a lot of analysis of (real/complex) and work with (signal processing) the transform.

In a physics class I'm taking, the professor defined the transform with the negative signs in the forward and reverse kernels flipped; this is against any and all known conventions that I'm aware of. Theoretically, it doesn't make a difference since its a simple substitution, but in practice, it causes really screws things up like using an FFT function built into MATLAB and Mathematica. Also, the tables of transforms and properties are all flipped around.

That is, in the physics class, the forward (and reverse) transforms are as follows:

\mathcal{F}\left\{x\left(t\right)\right\}(f) = X\left(f\right) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}x\left(t\right)e^{j2\pi f t}dt

\mathcal{F}^{-1}\left\{X\left(f\right)\right\}(t) = x\left(t\right) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}X\left(f\right)e^{-j2\pi f t}df

Is there a reason for this? I can't think of a physical situation where defining the transforms as such is more advantageous than the generally accepted formulas.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There is no reason. Which has + and which has - in the exponent is purely a matter of convention. You might ask your professor why he switched - it may have been an oversight. You should bring up the possible problems with MATLAB and Mathematica.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K