Question on Diffraction Grating

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a diffraction grating problem involving three bright fringes on either side of the central maximum with a wavelength of 490 nm. The user initially uses the equation d sin(theta) = m lambda / 2 but realizes the factor of 2 is incorrect for constructive interference. The maximum angle theta is clarified to be 90 degrees, as this represents the furthest displacement from the central maximum. The user confirms that m=3 is appropriate for the three visible fringes. Overall, the conversation helps clarify the correct approach to the problem and the understanding of the maximum angle in diffraction.
tigerguy
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi - I'm trying a problem on diffraction grating, and I keep on getting stuck. Maybe someone can help me figure out the last step:

Three, and only three, bright fringes can be seen on either side of the central maximum when a grating is illuminated with light ( wavelegnth = 490 nm). What is the maximum number of lines/cm for the grating?

Basically, what I've done is that I'm using the equation d sin(theta) = m lambda / 2
I figure that because its constructive itnerefrence for 3 fringes, m=3, and the wavelength will equal the aforementioned number. I also know that N= 1/d. So, I'm trying to figure out the value of sin(), but I'm not really sure what theta would equal to. How would I figure that out?

Is my reasoning correct, or am I missing something critical to solving this problem? Thanks so much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tigerguy said:
Basically, what I've done is that I'm using the equation d sin(theta) = m lambda / 2
Where did that 2 come from?
So, I'm trying to figure out the value of sin(), but I'm not really sure what theta would equal to.
Hint: What's the maximum value that theta can be?
 
Oh, the 2 shouldn't be there, because its constructive interference, not destructive. Does the m=3 make sense, too?

I'm not sure what the maximum value can be - would it be 90 degrees (pi/2), because that's the maximum value that sin can be?
 
tigerguy said:
Oh, the 2 shouldn't be there, because its constructive interference, not destructive.
Right.
Does the m=3 make sense, too?
Makes perfect sense to me.

I'm not sure what the maximum value can be - would it be 90 degrees (pi/2), because that's the maximum value that sin can be?
Not because that angle gives the max value for sin (which it does), but because the greatest displacement from the central maximum will be at 90 degrees. (Any more than that and the light would have to go backwards.)
 
Great, I understand it now. Thanks so much!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top