Question on Finding Transmission Coefficient

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the transmission coefficient for a potential defined by two Dirac delta functions. The participant expresses uncertainty about how to approach the problem, particularly due to the book's omission of non-zero potentials. They consider using the Schrödinger wave equation but find it complex due to the delta functions. The key insight is that while the wavefunction must be continuous at the points of the delta functions, the derivative does not need to be continuous due to the nature of the potential. This understanding allows for further progress in solving the problem.
arenaninja
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the transmission coefficient for the potential V(x)=-\alpha\left[\delta\left(x+a\right)+\delta\left(x-a\right)\right], where alpha and a are positive constants.

Homework Equations


T \equiv \frac{\left|F\right|^{2}}{\left|A\right|^{2}}

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm technically not sure on where to begin this problem. After reading the section (twice now), I noticed that it pretty much explicitly omits considering potentials which are not zero. And also, there is another formula for the transmission coefficient
T=\frac{1}{1+ \beta^{2}}
but, again, I'm not too sure on whether I should be using this one. My first instinct is to solve the Schrodinger wave equation, but it looks to be fairly mmessy with those dirac deltas.

Am I missing something really obvious? To recap, it looks like the book's section wanted to purposely omit non-zero potentials, and yet this problem appears to have a non-zero potential, leaving me clueless as to how to deal with it short of starting from scratch.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The potential is zero in the 3 regions: x< -a, -a<x<a, a<x, so you can solve for the wavefunctions in those regions. You can obtain relations between the coefficients by demanding that certain physical conditions be satisfied. For example, the wavefunction must be continuous at x=\pm a. However, because the potential is not continuous, we cannot demand that the derivative of the wavefunction is continuous. However, Schrodinger's equation must still be valid, so we can obtain relationships across the singular points by integrating the Schrodinger equation around x=\pm a:

\int_{x=\pm a-\epsilon}^{x=\pm a+\epsilon} \left( - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \psi''(x) + (V(x)-E) \psi(x) \right) =0.
 
ahhh, that's right. Thanks a lot, it makes a lot more sense from your first sentence and I can make some more progress on this one now.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top