Question on problem 2.16 (a) of the Feynman Lectures (two-mass pulley)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of two masses in a pulley system as described in the Feynman Lectures. The initial approach involves subtracting the component of one mass's acceleration from the other and dividing by two, but this method is deemed incorrect. The angle of 45 degrees is crucial, as it affects the sine calculations used to resolve forces. The correct formula for acceleration includes both masses and should reflect that if one mass is significantly larger, the acceleration approaches free fall. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly resolving forces and understanding the principles behind the Atwood Machine.
tomul
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
There is a mass-pulley system as shown in the attachment. I am asked to find the acceleration of M2 with M2 > M1.
Relevant Equations
acceleration of free fall : g
sinθ = O / H
My attempt was to calculate the acceleration of M2 as the acceleration of M2 if it were the only mass in the system, minus the component of M1's acceleration along the slope. And then I would divide the whole thing by 2 to get the acceleration for just one of the two masses@

a = 1/2 ( g - [acceleration of M1 along slope] )

Based on what I've seen online, this approach seems to be correct, however I think I'm resolving the acceleration incorrectly. The angle in the triangle is 45 degrees, so taking the sine of this will give sin 45 = O / H. The opposite should be the acceleration downwards due to gravity and since weight acts downwards, I figured this should just be free fall acceleration, g. So to get the component along the slope I would need to rearrange for H. sin45 = g / H becomes g / sin45 = H. So:

a = 1/2 (g - g/sin45)
a = g/2 (1-1/sin45)

But it seems the actual answer is:

a = g/2 (1 - sin45)

I can only think that I must have resolved the acceleration incorrectly...
 

Attachments

  • 9B62FB21-D99B-444F-871F-BC602A0A447E.jpg
    9B62FB21-D99B-444F-871F-BC602A0A447E.jpg
    31.2 KB · Views: 135
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When you make a projection of a force into components, you need to draw a line orthogonal to the direction you project on, not orthogonal to the force.
 
Hi @tomul. Welcome to PF. Your approach seems based on 'hunches' (and is wrong)!

One good way to partially check an answer is to consider an extreme case. Suppose M₂ is very large compared to M₁. You could even consider M₁=0. What would you expect to happen?

I hope you can see that M₂'s acceleration should be very nearly equal to g.

This is not consistent with either your answer or the 'official' answer. So something is wrong.

The correct answer is a formula which includes both M₁ and M₂.

I suggest you:
- check you have got the question and 'official' answer correct;
- read (or watch videos) about how to solve simple Atwood Machine problems';
- find out how to resolve a force into componente. I once made a video about this starting from basics. If you think it would help, here it is:
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Back
Top