Question on Rotational Dynamics of Yoyo

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the equation Vcm = Rw for a yoyo in motion, where Vcm is the center of mass velocity, R is the radius, and w is the angular speed. The poster questions the validity of this equation, noting that unlike a tire rolling on a stationary road, the yoyo string is being pulled, suggesting that the center of mass velocity may not simply be Rw. They express confusion about how the tension in the string affects the yoyo's motion, particularly when the tension equals the weight of the yoyo, which could imply Vcm equals zero. The poster ultimately seeks clarification on whether their reasoning is flawed, given the dynamics of the yoyo's movement. The discussion highlights the complexities of rotational dynamics in scenarios involving moving strings and tension forces.
fchen720
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Please see attached picture.

Homework Equations


Shown in picture

The Attempt at a Solution


It's a textbook example that has a solution.
At the middle right hand side of the picture, they say "From Eq... Vcm = Rw"
(Where 'cm' is centre of mass)
I don't understand why this is true.

Previously in the textbook they talked about rolling without slipping, where they mentioned a rubber tire rolling on cement. They reasoned that the velocity of the point of contact is zero relative to the road.
I.E Vcontact_point-rel-road = 0
Then Vcm-rel-road = Vcm-rel-contact_point + Vcontact_point-rel-road = Vcm-rel-contact_point = R * w
(Where w is angular speed and R is radius)
I understand all of that.

But I question the soundness of applying that to the example in question, because the yoyo string would be analogous to the road, but the road didn't move and the string does. And since the string is being pulled up, wouldn't Vcm be not as simple as just R*w? Wouldn't I have to account for the speed of the string?

And furthermore, looking at (10.14) in the picture, if my T force is large enough to equal Mg, would Vcm not just equal zero? And looking at (10.15), such a large T force would cause a large angular velocity.
So then Vcm =/= R*w

Is the something wrong with my reasoning?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20150402_172421.jpg
    IMG_20150402_172421.jpg
    37 KB · Views: 437
Physics news on Phys.org
fchen720 said:
the string is being pulled up
I don't see anything to suggest that. Looks like the top of the string is being held fixed.
 
I'm face palming right now... Thank you so much.
 
fchen720 said:
I'm face palming right now... Thank you so much.
ok!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top