Question on the Gauss' Law's Qenc

  • Thread starter Thread starter IsaacOh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gauss
AI Thread Summary
Gauss' Law states that the electric flux through a closed surface is proportional to the charge enclosed within that surface, expressed as Φ = ∫E·dA = Qenc/ε0. The charge enclosed (Qenc) is determined by the total charge within the chosen Gaussian surface, which can be calculated by summing discrete charges or integrating charge density. The selection of the Gaussian surface shape should be based on convenience to simplify calculations, ideally aligning with the electric field lines. This principle connects to the divergence theorem in vector analysis, linking volume integrals of charge density to surface integrals of electric flux. Understanding these concepts is crucial for applying Gauss' Law in electromagnetism.
IsaacOh
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I understand Gauss' Law is: Phi = integral(E)dA = Qenc/epsilon0

I never understood how you determine that Qenc. I know it varies from shape to shape. Can someone help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's simply the total charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface that you chose to integrate over on the left-hand side. If we assume that we are dealing with discrete charges, then it would be summation of the enclosed charges. Otherwise, more generally, it is the integration of the enclosed charge density. As such,

\int_\Gamma \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{S} = \frac{1}{\epsilon} \int_\Gamma \rho(\mathbf{r}) dS
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi IsaacOh! Welcome to PF! :wink:
IsaacOh said:
I never understood how you determine that Qenc. I know it varies from shape to shape.

Qenc is simply the charge enclosed by whatever shape the ∫ is over

do you mean, what shape should you choose?

whatever is most convenient (ie, makes the maths simplest, eg because it cuts all the field lines at 0° or 90°)​

(do a google image search for Guass' law for some pictures)
 
Thanks Born2bwire and Tiny-Tim for replying! My question was how do you determine Qenc and Bor2bwire, I believe, answered that.
 
Well, there is a bit of confusion in this answer. First one should mention that this kind of reasoning boils down to the integral theorems of classical vector analysis or, in a more modern way in terms of alternating differential forms, to the general Stokes theorem.

Let's put it in the classical way of 3D Euclidean vector analysis since this is more intuitive and that's what's needed in E&M intro lectures. Gauß's Law connects the volume integral over the divergence of the vector field with the integral of this vector field over the surface integral along the boundary of the volume, i.e.,

\int_V \mathrm{d}^3 x \vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{V} = \int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{F} \cdot \vec{V}.

Here, the surface-element normal vectors have to be oriented such that they always point out of the volume you integrate over. This is a mathematical theorem valid for any sufficiently well-behaved vector fields, volumes and boundaries.

One application of this mathematical theorem in E&M is to use Gauß's Law of electrodynamics, which is one of the fundamental laws of electromagnetism, i.e., one of Maxwell's equations:

\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{D}=\rho.

Here \vec{D} is the electric flux density and \rho the charge density. Using Gauß's theorem by integrating over a volume clearly gives the integral form of this law:

\int_{V} \mathrm{d}^3 x \rho=\int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{F} \cdot \vec{D}.

On the right-hand side you have, by definition of charge density, the charge enclosed in the volume, V, and on the right-hand side the electric flux through the boundary of this same volume. Of course, again you have to orient the suface-normal vectors out of this volume, i.e., the relative orientation of the boundary to the volume must be positive.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Does Poisson's equation hold due to vector potential cancellation?'
Imagine that two charged particles, with charge ##+q##, start at the origin and then move apart symmetrically on the ##+y## and ##-y## axes due to their electrostatic repulsion. The ##y##-component of the retarded Liénard-Wiechert vector potential at a point along the ##x##-axis due to the two charges is $$ \begin{eqnarray*} A_y&=&\frac{q\,[\dot{y}]_{\mathrm{ret}}}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 c^2[(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}+y\dot{y}/c]_{\mathrm{ret}}}\tag{1}\\...
Back
Top