Question on the reduction of FeO by CO

  • Thread starter Thread starter hurreechunder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reduction
AI Thread Summary
In the reaction FeO + CO = Fe + CO2, calculations for standard molar enthalpies and entropies at 298K indicate that the Gibbs free energy change (ΔG) at 1200K suggests the reaction is spontaneous. However, real-life observations in a blast furnace show a different equilibrium ratio of pCO2/pCO, which is 1/2.3, contradicting the calculated spontaneity. The initial calculations were corrected after realizing an error in handling the heat capacity (Cp), leading to a more accurate assessment of enthalpy changes. The discussion also highlights the complexity of the blast furnace environment, where multiple temperature zones affect the reaction dynamics, and questions whether the system is at equilibrium, noting that CO is not externally injected but rather produced through thermodynamic processes as it rises through the furnace.
hurreechunder
Messages
18
Reaction score
3
Some numbers below: these are the standard molar enthalpies and entropies at 298K that I got from a website.
In the reaction FeO + CO = Fe + CO2, the deltas are:
delta H = (0+ -393) - (-266.5+ -110.5) = -16.3 KJ/mol.
delta S = (27.2+213.8) - (197.9+54) = -10.9 J/mol/K
Now at 1200 K,
Go = -16.3 + (1200)(-10.9) = -3.23
I have ignored the effect of temperature on enthalpy as both the reactants and the products are at the same temperature.
The issue with this is that it suggests that the reaction is spontaneous at 1200K. Therefore, in G = Go + RT ln Q, ln Q is >0 and therefore pCO2/pCO>1. However, we know the opposite to be the case in real life where pCO2/pCO = 1/2.3 in the blast furnace
Where am I going wrong??

Hf (KJ/mol K)Sf (J/mol K)
FeOs
-266.5​
54​
COg
-110.5​
197.9​
CO2g
-393.3​
213.8​
Fes
0​
27.2​
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
hurreechunder said:
I have ignored the effect of temperature on enthalpy as both the reactants and the products are at the same temperature.
hurreechunder said:
Where am I going wrong??
 
Thanks - I took a second look at the calcs, and it appears that I was dividing the Cp in KJ/Kg by the molar mass instead of multiplying it. With that adjustment, the temperature adjustment of the enthalpy is no longer negligible. I am still getting a number different than 2.3, but at least Ln(Q) is negative.
 
hurreechunder said:
Therefore, in G = Go + RT ln Q, ln Q is >0
What are you taking as G and G0 here?
Are you assuming that the blast furnace is at equilibrium? Is that true? Do they add extra CO to force the reaction to the right?
 
dG (note: should have used the deltas in the original post) = 0 in the limiting case. I'm trying to find the corresponding value of ln Q = pCO2/pCO

dGo = dH-TdS; where for every reactant and product, H = Ho + Cp(T-298K). It's a bit complicated because the Cp itself changes with temperature.

The blast furnace has many zones in it, corresponding to different temperatures, as the iron ore travels down from the top and the CO comes up from the bottom. The CO is not injected externally. The ratio of CO2 to CO comes about from thermodynamic balance as the CO travels up from the bottom and reduces the iron ore in the layers above.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
I'm trying to find a cheap DIY method to etch holes of various shapes through 0.3mm Aluminium sheet using 5-10% Sodium Hydroxide. The idea is to apply a resist to the Aluminium then selectively ablate it off using a diode laser cutter and then dissolve away the Aluminium using Sodium Hydroxide. By cheap I mean resists costing say £20 in small quantities. The Internet has suggested various resists to try including... Enamel paint (only survived seconds in the NaOH!) Acrylic paint (only...
Back
Top