Question on Vectors and Components (NOT HW)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the difference between the projection of vector c onto vectors a and b, and the components of c along a and b. Projections involve dropping a perpendicular from the tip of c to the line defined by a or b, while components are the scalar multiples that express c as a combination of a and b. The projection can be calculated using the inner product, while components are determined by the equation c = caa + cbb. Although visually similar, projections and components yield different results unless a and b are orthogonal unit vectors. Overall, the concepts are related but distinct in their mathematical definitions and applications.
037810
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Okay, let's say there's vector a,b and c

What would be the difference between


projection of c on a and b

and

components of c along a and b


I thought they were the same...

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The projections are like putting c and a or b tail to tail and dropping a perpendicular from the tip of c to the line defined by a or b and measuring from the tail of a or b to the intersection. In an inner product space with inner product <.,.>, the projection onto b can be calculated by <b, c>/||b||.
The components of c with respect to a and b are the numbers ca and cb such that c = caa + cbb. In the case that c is the sum of a and b, the components with respect to a and b are (1, 1). By the parallelogram law, this obviously does not correspond to the projection unless a and b are orthogonal unit vectors.
 
hmm... but drawing wise, they are the same?
 
Drawing wise they should be the same as saying what the poster above said by
grabbing the vector a and the vector c (we are projecting a onto c in this case) and its just the length of a in the c direction.

With regards to your question I'm pretty sure you have the right idea.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
69
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top