Question re: Planets Facing Each Other

  • Thread starter Thread starter JorgeMedinero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planets
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the frequency of alignment between two points on different planets, specifically how often a laser beam from Earth (Point 1) can hit a target on Mercury (Point 2). The user seeks a simple equation or method to predict when this alignment will occur again, considering the complexities of planetary rotation and orbit. They also explore the possibility of re-aiming the laser to establish unobstructed vectors between any two points on different planets. The conversation highlights the unpredictability of planetary rotation rates and their measurement challenges. Ultimately, the inquiry emphasizes the need for a systematic approach to understanding these celestial alignments.
JorgeMedinero
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
It may be that this question makes assumptions that are themselves invalid -- I am less than an amateur. But here goes.

Is there any easy way to determine how often Point 1 on Planet A and Point 2 on Planet B will align? That is, if at Time X you could draw a straight, unobstructed vector from Point 1 to Point 2, is there a simple equation for figuring out when the same vector will connect the same two points. Is there any assurance it will occur again?

Here is the thought experiment:

Thank you for the welcome!

Let us say that the vector is relative to the planetary surface -- imagine that I have a laser device (on Earth, Planet A) that shoots a perfectly straight, instantaneous beam (I know, impossible per Einstein). The device is fixed in place, angle, and so forth, save for the fact that the Earth rotates and orbits and so forth. The laser has a targeting scope.

It is located at Point 1. At Time X Mercury comes into my targeting scope and I fire, burning a spot at Point 2 on Mercury's surface.

Astronauts then travel to Mercury. They put a bullseye at Point 2. My question is whether there will ever be a Time Y at which my laser can shoot the bullseye, and if so, how it can be predicted.

---

Alternatively, is there any easy way to determine how often *any* unobstructed vector can be drawn from Point 1 to Point 2? In this case, the laser device can be re-aimed, but cannot be moved.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The rotation rate (ie. length of a day) of planets is fairly constant but its value is random in that it depends on the precise arragement of particles at their creation - there is no law to predict the rotation rate from the mass or position of the planet.

The rotation rate of venus for instance was only measured once it was possible to detect mountains under the constant clouds using radar, the rotation rate of Jupiter is very easy to measure because you can watch the red spot go round.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top