Question regarding Bouyancy in Water

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ralith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bouyancy Water
AI Thread Summary
In a discussion about buoyancy, two identical containers are compared: one filled with helium and the other evacuated of air. The vacuum container, being lighter than the helium-filled one, is expected to rise faster in water. The conversation highlights that if the envelope of the vacuum container is strong enough to withstand external pressure, it could theoretically outperform helium in buoyancy. This leads to the conclusion that a vacuum is the optimal fill for achieving maximum lift in an airship. The exploration of buoyancy principles emphasizes the importance of weight and density in fluid dynamics.
Ralith
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
This has been bugging me for a bit. Take two, identical, rigid containers. Fill one with helium at the level in say... a balloon? Then take the other one, and suck all the air out. Take them to the bottom of a container of water- Which will go up quicker?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Assuming the vacuum one doesn't crush - it will weigh slightly less than the helium one and so rise faster.
If you could make the envolope strong enough, 'nothing' is the best thing to fill an airship with.
 
Thanks. Thought so, but wasn't sure.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top