Question regarding homeostasis in Daphnia

  • Thread starter Thread starter chris097
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a lab experiment involving Daphnia and a grain of yeast, exploring how this scenario illustrates homeostasis. The Daphnia's movement towards the food source suggests it seeks an optimal feeding environment, indicating a response to external changes. Participants express uncertainty about classifying this behavior as a feedback loop, with the consensus that feedback mechanisms are not applicable in this context since the change is externally driven rather than internally regulated. The conversation highlights the distinction between external stimuli responses and internal homeostatic regulation. Overall, the Daphnia's behavior exemplifies its adaptation to environmental changes for stability.
chris097
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I recently did a lab where i added a single grain of yeast to a water drop with a Daphnia. I was wondering how this experiment represents homeostasis. All i noticed was the Daphnia moved closer to the food source and pretty much burrowed inside of the granule.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think its because the daphnia won't have to move for food, so its stable and in its "best?" area.
 
i don't really know how to explain it...but i know what it means...i don't know try to glean what you can off of my crappy explanation. :P
 
So its response to the change in the environment is that it moves closer to the food source because this is the ideal position for it to feed. Also is this a negative or positive feedback loop. I don't think that really applies here because the change is not regulated internally.
 
yep, and think that feedback loops don't apply in this condition, because a negative feedback loop would apply somewhere like your stomach for protein digestion, pepsin, pepsinogen and all the like :P
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top