Question regarding Michaelis-menten plot and equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter wh00pwh00p
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plot
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around fitting a Michaelis-Menten plot to the chemical rate equation J=JMAX ([S] / (KM + [S])). Participants express uncertainty about the correct approach to analyze the plot and whether selecting a specific value of J for comparison is valid. There is a suggestion to consider the behavior of J when substrate concentration [S] is significantly larger than KM. Additionally, the importance of transforming the equation to plot parameters for linearity is emphasized, along with practical advice on drawing best-fit lines. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of applying theoretical concepts to experimental data in biochemistry.
wh00pwh00p
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a michaelis-menten plot and I need to see if it fits the chemical rate equation.

Homework Equations



J=JMAX ( / KM + )

The Attempt at a Solution



I can get values for the entire equation from the plot. My idea was to choose a value of J and insert the relevant values into the equation. then compare the solution to my chosen value of J. Does this make sense? i have a feeling there is some major mathematical flaw somewhere!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wh00pwh00p said:

Homework Statement



I have a michaelis-menten plot and I need to see if it fits the chemical rate equation.

Not sure what that means, does it mean you have some experimental points?

Homework Equations



J=JMAX ( / (KM + )

The Attempt at a Solution



I can get values for the entire equation from the plot. My idea was to choose a value of J and insert the relevant values into the equation. then compare the solution to my chosen value of J. Does this make sense? i have a feeling there is some major mathematical flaw somewhere!



For a reasonably good idea at least, what is J when S is large, S>>Km ?

Although this is not usually recommended for fitting the curve.

I can't believe they have thrown this task at you and nowhere in your handouts or books is there any idea of how you home in on these constants. It is in almost every My First Book Of Biochemistry.

But if you really have to work it out, you are supposed to transform your equation into one of several forms where you can plot one parameter calculated from the experiments against another and the result is a straight line if your equation is obeyed. You then find - calculate with a scientific calculator - the straight line that best fits the points. However if you don't know how to do this best fit, drawing the best line by eye with ruler is (secret) just as good for now, though frowned on by academics and journals of a certain level.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top