Question Regarding System of Equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around modeling two rectangular fields with a total of 600m of fencing, one fully enclosed and the other open on one side due to a river. The first field's area is modeled as A = -x² + 300x, while the second field's area is A = -2x² + 600x. The original poster struggles with the equations, questioning their validity after obtaining illogical solutions from their calculations. A key suggestion is to use different variables for the two fields to avoid confusion. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly setting up equations in systems of equations for accurate modeling.
trulyfalse
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Hey Pf, I'm working on precalculus review and I have found myself stumped by a question.

Homework Statement



A rectangular field is enclosed by 600m of fencing. A second rectangular field, which is alongside a river, has the same area and is also enclosed by 600m of fencing. However, this second field has fencing on only three sides because there is no need for fencing along the riverbank. Create a system of quadratic equations to model the problem. (Answer: A = -x2+300x, A = -2x2+60x)

Homework Equations



ax2+bx+c

The Attempt at a Solution



I began by modeling the first field:
P = 2x+2y
600 = 2x+2y
300 = x+y
y = -x+300

A = xy
A = x(-x+300)
A = -x2+300x

Afterwards I modeled the second field:
600 = 2x+y
y = -2x+600

A = xy
A = x(-2x+600)
A = -2x2+600x

As you can see, the equations are different. I cannot see where I went wrong. Could someone please correct my folly? :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't see where you wrong, are you sure you read the answer right?
 
Positive. It may be of use to note when I entered the equations I created into my calculator it yielded solutions of (0,0) and (0,300). Seeing as those solutions are illogical, that means it's either a bad question, or I made an error somewhere along the way.

EDIT: I just used the same method of checking for the "correct" solution; it yielded values of (-240,-129600) and (0,0). Perhaps it's just a bad question...
 
Well the area of the second one should be \geq the first one. And if the answers are right, that doesn't always hold true.
 
I'll skip it and move on I suppose. :)
 
Yeah that might be a good idea.
 
trulyfalse said:
Hey Pf, I'm working on precalculus review and I have found myself stumped by a question.

Homework Statement



A rectangular field is enclosed by 600m of fencing. A second rectangular field, which is alongside a river, has the same area and is also enclosed by 600m of fencing. However, this second field has fencing on only three sides because there is no need for fencing along the riverbank. Create a system of quadratic equations to model the problem. (Answer: A = -x2+300x, A = -2x2+60x)

Homework Equations



ax2+bx+c

The Attempt at a Solution



I began by modeling the first field:
P = 2x+2y
600 = 2x+2y
300 = x+y
y = -x+300

A = xy
A = x(-x+300)
A = -x2+300x

Afterwards I modeled the second field:
600 = 2x+y
y = -2x+600

A = xy
A = x(-2x+600)
A = -2x2+600x

As you can see, the equations are different. I cannot see where I went wrong. Could someone please correct my folly? :)

You can't use the same variables for the two fields.
Let x1 and y1 be the width and length of the first field (the one with fences along all four sides).
Let x2 and y2 be the width and length of the second field (the one with the river as one boundary).

For the first field, A = x1*y1 = x1(300 - x1)
For the second field, A = x2*y2 = x2(600 - 2x2)
 
Back
Top