Question Regarding the Orbit of Comets

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the orbital dynamics of comets, particularly the Kreutz family of sun-grazing comets. It highlights the contrast between the gravitational influence of the Sun and other celestial bodies, explaining why comets with elongated orbits do not become "locked" to other bodies as they travel through the solar system. The Sun's massive gravitational pull dominates, limiting the sphere of influence of smaller bodies like Jupiter, which can alter comet orbits only if they pass close enough. The conversation also touches on the origins of these comets, suggesting that their distant origins lack significant mass to exert a strong gravitational influence. Overall, the gravitational mechanics of the solar system dictate the predictable paths of comets despite their elongated orbits.
Yosty22
Messages
182
Reaction score
4
Recently, I attended a lecture at my university entitled "The Life and Death of a Star-Grazing Comet" presented by John Raymond, an astrophysicist at Harvard Smithsonian. In this lecture, he talked about Comet Lovejoy and how it allowed us to help study the corona of the sun. As the comet was so big, it survived going through the corona of the sun and allowed us to understand it (since we saw it come out the other side before it vaporized about a day later).

However, when he showed a picture of the orbit of the Kreutz family of comets (attached) depicting an extremely elongated orbit as it approaches our sun. From what I have always believed, the Earth is gravitationally "locked" to the sun; that is it is orbiting the sun and the sun is the major body influencing the Earth's motion (keeping it going around the sun and not another body). I was wondering how a comet can get such an elongated orbit and still be gravitationally locked to the sun in the same way, that is we can predict when it will return because it has a very specific orbital period.

If something is going so far out in the solar system, why does it not get "locked" to another body that it gets closer to on the way to and from the sun? If the orbit is so elongated, why doesn't it fall into orbit of another large body somewhere else in the solar system? Is it because of where they come from, as in nothing out where they come from is massive enough to hold a comet in their orbit?

Edit: in the picture, as I'm sure you guessed, the thing, very elongated lines coming from the bottom of the page are the orbital paths of the Kreutz family of sun-grazing comets.
 

Attachments

  • Kreutz_Comet_Orbits.ogv.jpg
    Kreutz_Comet_Orbits.ogv.jpg
    37.6 KB · Views: 646
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hi Yosty22! :smile:
Yosty22 said:
If something is going so far out in the solar system, why does it not get "locked" to another body that it gets closer to on the way to and from the sun? If the orbit is so elongated, why doesn't it fall into orbit of another large body somewhere else in the solar system? Is it because of where they come from, as in nothing out where they come from is massive enough to hold a comet in their orbit?

It will get "locked" if it gets close enough to a planet.

(lots of comets are caught, or at least have their orbits altered, by Jupiter)

But there aren't any planets out there, away from the plane of the ecliptic!
 
The Sun is so much more massive than the rest of the bodies in the solar system that it's gravitational influence dominates almost everywhere.

For a body to be captured by some other body's gravity(or "locked", as you say), it has to pass close enough to it that the gravitational field of the small body becomes stronger than that from the Sun. But since the Sun is so massive, that sphere of influence(called Hill Sphere - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hill_sphere) is very small.

You can get a feel for the distances involved by analysing the gravitational field equation:

g=G\frac{M}{R^2}

where g is basically the acceleration experienced by anybody at distance R from the mass M, towards that body.

So, the gravitational field of e.g. Jupiter, which is ~1/1000th as massive as the Sun, would become stronger than our star's only if the distance to Jupiter is ~31 times closer than to the Sun.
 
Thanks for the reference on the hill sphere, its a term I hadn't heard before not even in my astronomy textbooks Grrrrr. Not too surprised on the textbook thing though lol astronomy is a broad science.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top