Which Fields Lead to Cutting-Edge Technological Research?

  • Thread starter Thread starter random_soldier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fields
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying fields of study that align closely with applied physics and engineering, particularly those that are likely to lead to cutting-edge technological advancements in the near future. Participants suggest that nanotechnology is a strong candidate due to its focus on miniaturization and electronics. Quantum computing, particularly within quantum information science, is also highlighted for its potential impact on technology. Other fields mentioned include photonics, condensed matter physics, and neural engineering, which may also contribute to significant technological developments. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of selecting fields that not only have theoretical significance but also practical applications in advancing technology.
random_soldier
Messages
80
Reaction score
10
I thought I'd post this here since it's not exactly a homework question or discussion regarding a specific operation in a field/subject.

Out of the following, which fields gravitate more towards applied physics/engineering (but not necessarily such a discipline)? Or maybe if that's confusing, another way I would ask this is, study in which of the following fields would lead into research on the most cutting edge of technology with a high likelihood of some degree of achievability of said technology within the foreseeable future?

1. Particle Physics
2. Quantum physics
a. Quantum information science (computing, information theory, etc.)
b. Quantum Field theory/Quantum gravity
3. Nuclear Physics/Engineering/Technology or Solar Physics
4. Photonics
5. Photovoltaics
6. Astrophysics
7. Condensed Matter physics
8. Dynamic systems theory (Control Theory, Chaos Theory, Quantum chaos, etc.)
9. Neural Engineering
10. Study of Complex Systems
11. Nanotech
 
Physics news on Phys.org
random_soldier said:
I thought I'd post this here since it's not exactly a homework question or discussion regarding a specific operation in a field/subject.

Out of the following, which fields gravitate more towards applied physics/engineering (but not necessarily such a discipline)? Or maybe if that's confusing, another way I would ask this is, study in which of the following fields would lead into research on the most cutting edge of technology with a high likelihood of some degree of achievability of said technology within the foreseeable future?

1. Particle Physics
2. Quantum physics
a. Quantum information science (computing, information theory, etc.)
b. Quantum Field theory/Quantum gravity
3. Nuclear Physics/Engineering/Technology or Solar Physics
4. Photonics
5. Photovoltaics
6. Astrophysics
7. Condensed Matter physics
8. Dynamic systems theory (Control Theory, Chaos Theory, Quantum chaos, etc.)
9. Neural Engineering
10. Study of Complex Systems
11. Nanotech

I'm no expert, but I'd vote for nanotech.

Anything having to do with miniaturization of electronics is a safe bet. I don't know what neural engineering is.
 
random_soldier said:
I thought I'd post this here since it's not exactly a homework question or discussion regarding a specific operation in a field/subject.

Out of the following, which fields gravitate more towards applied physics/engineering (but not necessarily such a discipline)? Or maybe if that's confusing, another way I would ask this is, study in which of the following fields would lead into research on the most cutting edge of technology with a high likelihood of some degree of achievability of said technology within the foreseeable future?

1. Particle Physics
2. Quantum physics
a. Quantum information science (computing, information theory, etc.)
b. Quantum Field theory/Quantum gravity
3. Nuclear Physics/Engineering/Technology or Solar Physics
4. Photonics
5. Photovoltaics
6. Astrophysics
7. Condensed Matter physics
8. Dynamic systems theory (Control Theory, Chaos Theory, Quantum chaos, etc.)
9. Neural Engineering
10. Study of Complex Systems
11. Nanotech

Quantum computing and nanotechnology.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
Back
Top