Question regarding time independent perturbation theory

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on time-independent perturbation theory in quantum mechanics, specifically regarding the Hamiltonian formulation. The total Hamiltonian is expressed as $$H = H_0 + H_1 = \dfrac{p^2}{2m} + V(x) + \lambda x^2$$. The key point is that when the perturbation parameter $$\lambda$$ is included within the Hamiltonian, the energy expansion remains as $$E = E_n^{0} + \lambda E_n^{1} + \lambda^2 E_n^{2}$$, with each term reflecting increasing powers of $$\lambda$$. This structure is essential for the perturbation series to converge effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with perturbation theory in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of power series expansions
  • Basic concepts of quantum electrodynamics (QED)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of time-independent perturbation theory
  • Learn about the implications of perturbation theory in quantum electrodynamics (QED)
  • Explore the role of small parameters in perturbative expansions
  • Investigate the mathematical techniques for extracting factors from Hamiltonians
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in perturbation theory and its applications in quantum electrodynamics.

Kidiz
Messages
21
Reaction score
4
Let's say we've a system which can be described by the Hamiltonian:

$$H_0 = \dfrac{p^2}{2m} + V(x)$$

Now suppose we introduce a perturbation given by:

$$H_1 = \lambda x^2$$

Our total hamiltonian:

$$H = H_0 + H_1 = \dfrac{p^2}{2m} + V(x) + \lambda x^2 $$

Normally, the perturbation doesn't have the factor ##\lambda## inside of it. It's usually written has ##H = H_0 + \lambda H_1##, which gives us the energy ##E = E_n ^{0} + \lambda E_n ^{1} + \lambda ^2 E_n ^{2}##.

Now, my question is:

Is the energy given by:

$$E = E_n ^{0} + \lambda E_n ^{1} + \lambda ^2 E_n ^{2}$$

even if we've ##\lambda## inside the ##H_1##? Or should it be something like ##E = E_n ^{0} + E_n ^{1} + E_n ^{2}##, since the ##E_n ^{1}## and ##E_n ^{2}## will have ##\lambda## as a factor?PS: My title is horrible, but I couldn't think of something better.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kidiz said:
Or should it be something like ##E = E_n ^{0} + E_n ^{1} + E_n ^{2}##, since the ##E_n ^{1}## and ##E_n ^{2}## will have ##\lambda## as a factor?
This. If the parameter that makes the perturbation small is inside the Hamiltonian (as it often is), then there is no λ appearing explicitly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kidiz
DrClaude said:
This. If the parameter that makes the perturbation small is inside the Hamiltonian (as it often is), then there is no λ appearing explicitly.

However, it's important to remember that the sequence ##E^0_n + E^1_n + E^2_n + ...## will still have increasing powers of ##\lambda## in each term. This fact, plus the fact that ##\lambda## is small, is what makes each term of the sequence get progressively smaller, which is the thing that makes perturbation theory work in the first place. Because of how central this concept is, it's often more informative to pull out the factor ##\lambda## from the interaction term and put it explicitly into the sequence, so that it's more easily seen which parameter you are expanding the series in terms of. That's why you hear people describe a QED calculation with terms like "to fourth order in ##e##", even though the electric charge ##e## is built directly into the QED Hamiltonian.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kidiz

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K