Question regarding voltage, current and resistance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the theoretical concept of zero resistance in electrical systems, noting that while it's impossible for an object to have no resistance, superconductors can achieve zero resistance under specific conditions. It clarifies that in the equation V=IR, if resistance (R) is zero, voltage (V) also becomes zero, leading to no current flow. The relationship between voltage and resistance is explained through an analogy of friction, where increased resistance requires more work to maintain current flow. Current is ultimately limited to the speed of light, reinforcing the principles of electrical behavior. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the dynamics of voltage, current, and resistance in circuits.
Aichuk
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
It's impossible for an object to have no resistance but I was wondering if theoretically such a thing was possible, shouldn't the current flow infinitely fast? But instead, no current exists at all (V=I*0=0). And if the current remains the same, how come the voltage increases as I increase resistance? I'm sorry for the stupid questions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Current is always limited to the speed of light.

In your equation (V=IR), V = 0 when R = 0, but I can be any number. Certain materials, called superconductors, have zero resistance as long as they remain sufficiently cooled. Think of voltage as work, and resistance as friction. If you push a box across the cement, you have to continuously push and do work on it because of the friction. The more friction there is, the more work you have to do to maintain the same speed. A box on a frictionless surface will continue to move at the same speed it started at without any work at all (assuming no air resistance). This is similar to the zero resistance, zero voltage scenario.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top