Question related to power transmission

  • Thread starter Thread starter DarkStalker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Transmission
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the current flowing in cables connected to a power station outputting 100kW at 20,000V with a resistance of 5.0 Ω. The initial attempt to use Ohm's law (V=IR) incorrectly led to a current of 4000 A, while the correct calculation using power (I=P/V) yielded 5 A. Participants clarified that Ohm's law requires the potential difference between specific points, which is not applicable here since the 20,000 V is across the entire system, including the factory. They emphasized that the effective resistance of the factory must be considered for accurate calculations. The discussion concluded with an acknowledgment of the complexities involved in applying Ohm's law in this context.
DarkStalker
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
First of all I'd like to say hello. Secondly, my Physics is not very exceptional, so please don't mock me if I ask sth very dumb. :)

Homework Statement


A power station giving an output power of 100kW at 20000V is connected by cables to a factory.
If the resistance of the cables is 5.0 Ω, calculate:
(a) the current flowing in the cables,


Homework Equations


P=VI


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried solving this using "V=IR". Here's my attempt.

V=IR
20000 = I x 5
I = 20000/5 = 4000 A.

The actual solution given is:

Since P (Output) = IV where I is the current in the cables

I=P/V
= 100kW/20000
=...= 5A

I just need to know why we can't use "V=IR". My guess is it has to sth about a.c. or d.c.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi DarkStalker,

A more precise statement of Ohm's law would be:

<br /> \Delta V = I R<br />

so if you want to know the current flowing from one point to another, you need the resistance between those points and the voltage difference between those points. Can you see why the 5 ohms and the 20000 V don't go together in Ohm's law in this problem?
 
So what you're trying to say is that since we don't the potential difference between any two points on the wire, Ohm's law cannot be applied, right?
And if we knew the p.d., it would've been something like very lower than 20000?
 
DarkStalker said:
So what you're trying to say is that since we don't the potential difference between any two points on the wire, Ohm's law cannot be applied, right?
And if we knew the p.d., it would've been something like very lower than 20000?

Exactly right; the 20000 V potential difference is across the cable and the factory. So, if for example, they gave you the "effective resistance" of the factory, you could combine it in series with the 5 ohms from the cable and then follow your procedure.

The solution from the book works, because it uses the total power (of cable and factory) and the total potential difference (across cable and factory).


Now that you know the current, you could actually use your approach to find what the potential difference across the cable is.
 
Because the voltage is varying with the current throughout the /entire/ cable (because you have a 5 ohm resistance all the way to the factory), you cannot use ohm's law.

edit: a bit too late!
 
Thanks a lot, all of you. :)
BryanP said:
edit: a bit too late!
Not really. I'm so bad at physics that any different way of explaining helps.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top